VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Why China would win. [Locked]
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
reesescups posted:

You think Taiwan would join China if China and the US went toe to toe? Really, that's what you think?

Is that why I get free BJ's in Taiwan when I say I am an American?



you mean you get free BJ's from ugly sluts? I never said I was from the PRC.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
Tipztoe posted:

china doesn't need military invasions.. the current population invasions are working very well.



They are indeed. All those "millionaires" going to Canada and America that some tards here are bragging about will simply colonize the West coast, making them 1,000x better for everyone

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
-Espiritu-  2 stars
Posts: 269
Registered: 2004-11-29 18:27:00
dae_trist posted:

GrymmDAOC posted:

Carriers are far more vulnerable than people will admit, but China is still very vulnerable to interdiction of its resource and oil supplies.



If you somehow plan to blockade the Sino-Russian border, sure.


GrymmDAOC posted:

The USA is quite capable of feeding itself.



Not once fallout destroys crops and water supplies.



so what you're saying is, the US is nuked to the point of coast to coast irradiation, but China and Russia are so untouched that they can continue aggricultural commerce between their two states?


Even in perfect first strike scenarios from a united Russia/China, our 14 Ohio Class SSBNs with a full compliment of 24 Trident II missiles will secure MAD. There will be no need for a blockade, since any significant population centers will be destroyed.

 

-----signature-----
Espiritu - SWTOR (retired)
Espiritu (MajorMUD, UO, DAoC, SB, FFXI, WoW, WAR, Travian, SC2, SWTOR)
Moe_Nox  4 stars
Title: In Moe We Trust
Posts: 1,962
Registered: 2007-2-4 12:17:56
Ok I skimmed over it. Makes more sense now.
The main hardship in any war with China would be protecting our allies, as opposed to actual US territory.
Japan, Korea, Taiwan, as well as some others would be in vastly greater danger than any Americans.

Neutralizing Chinese satellites, frying any of their net systems/driving them off the web, and choking trade flow of anything beyond India would be our focus.
Russia is the lynch pin for any such scenario. Just getting them to remain neutral would seal a victory for the west.

 

-----signature-----
The Nanny State cometh
Currency should be bacon cheeseburgers and blow jobs... - Reese
Life at the Outpost: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1771556
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
Moe_Nox posted:

Ok I skimmed over it. Makes more sense now.
The main hardship in any war with China would be protecting our allies, as opposed to actual US territory.
Japan, Korea, Taiwan, as well as some others would be in vastly greater danger than any Americans.

Neutralizing Chinese satellites, frying any of their net systems/driving them off the web, and choking trade flow of anything beyond India would be our focus.
Russia is the lynch pin for any such scenario. Just getting them to remain neutral would seal a victory for the west.



So you believe Russia would "remain neutral" if the US started an unprovoked war with China?

And you think Japan, Korea and especially Taiwan would get involved?

Even in this fantasy scenario you need to get all of Central Asia on board, and they don't really like anything about America aside from your $$$ which will immediately be worthless upon declaring war on the PRC.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
-Espiritu- posted:

so what you're saying is, the US is nuked to the point of coast to coast irradiation, but China and Russia are so untouched that they can continue aggricultural commerce between their two states?

Even in perfect first strike scenarios from a united Russia/China, our 14 Ohio Class SSBNs with a full compliment of 24 Trident II missiles will secure MAD. There will be no need for a blockade, since any significant population centers will be destroyed.



Not really, considering the first point precedes the second. The scenario is premised on China being blockaded which would mean sealing off the Russo-Chinese border (lol). America attempting to starve and mass murder Chinese civilians with blockades would probably be met with a nuclear holocaust after China knocks out all US satellites and destroys their power grid.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
Tipztoe  4 stars
Posts: 1,775
Registered: 2004-3-1 17:53:43
dae_trist posted:

Tipztoe posted:

china doesn't need military invasions.. the current population invasions are working very well.



They are indeed. All those "millionaires" going to Canada and America that some tards here are bragging about will simply colonize the West coast, making them 1,000x better for everyone



I hope the "China" town districts in various major cities aren't any indication of how they'll make it better.
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
Considering Chinatowns are low SE regions and are still actually safe enough to walk into, yes, their presence does make the place better.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
Tych2  4 stars
Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
reesescups posted:

dae_trist posted:

Moe_Nox posted:

No. China would win because the west is too soft hearted. In a war without remorse the US would destroy China to whatever degree of severity that we allowed ourselves.



40 years ago, maybe



Dizammm that took a little over 3 hours...

 

-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks
Moe_Nox  4 stars
Title: In Moe We Trust
Posts: 1,962
Registered: 2007-2-4 12:17:56
dae_trist posted:

Moe_Nox posted:

Ok I skimmed over it. Makes more sense now.
The main hardship in any war with China would be protecting our allies, as opposed to actual US territory.
Japan, Korea, Taiwan, as well as some others would be in vastly greater danger than any Americans.

Neutralizing Chinese satellites, frying any of their net systems/driving them off the web, and choking trade flow of anything beyond India would be our focus.
Russia is the lynch pin for any such scenario. Just getting them to remain neutral would seal a victory for the west.


So you believe Russia would "remain neutral" if the US started an unprovoked war with China?
And you think Japan, Korea and especially Taiwan would get involved?
Even in this fantasy scenario you need to get all of Central Asia on board, and they don't really like anything about America aside from your $$$ which will immediately be worthless upon declaring war on the PRC.


The only fantasy in any of the above text is where you somehow concocted the US starting this imaginary war, which was never stated.
Continue on with your paranoia, Twatter.

 

-----signature-----
The Nanny State cometh
Currency should be bacon cheeseburgers and blow jobs... - Reese
Life at the Outpost: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1771556

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.