| Author |
Topic:
Why China would win. [Locked] |
dae_trist  Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Eradiani posted:
Testerion posted:
Eradiani posted:
right.. because I'm sure china knows were all of our subs are that can launch nuclear missiles from around the globe are..
About as well as you guys know of Chinese 100-200 nukes that can all reach USA...MAD is a bitch.
Which is why this argument is silly. China wouldn't launch an attack on our aircraft carriers without expecting war from pretty much all of our allies.
Japan, South Korea, Singapore and India would definitely do nothing. Australia and Thailand are also unlikely. You're pretty much left with Britain and a few other major EU powers who would pretty much be useless, especially if Iran or Russia were to seize the opportunity to pursue their interests, without even mentioning the volatile situation across the Arab world.
-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
|
dae_trist Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
reesescups posted:
dae_trist posted:
Moe_Nox posted:
No. China would win because the west is too soft hearted. In a war without remorse the US would destroy China to whatever degree of severity that we allowed ourselves.
40 years ago, maybe
Dizammm that took a little over 3 hours...
Yeah, I have a life 
-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
|
reesescups Title: //Captain America
Posts: 2,537
Registered: 2003-5-26 14:45:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Moe_Nox posted:
Altra_Shadowstalker posted:
China would have to invade Mexico, which would be unwilling to allow them a forward base, so they'd be drawn into the war if China went that route and Canada has no chance of lending them aid.
Ok, I will give you the out of thinking hypothetically of some distant time when China has these mythical capabilities, because as of now, currently, there is no friggin way they can project that kind of power. They simply do not have the means to do any large scale amphibious D-day type assault.
They might arguably be capable of traveling to Taiwan and emerging victorious on a beach landing. Maybe.
Mexico? Canada? 
Taiwan would be China's Grenada...
-----signature-----
"man up, you wimp." - Groucho48
"I'm not racist at all." - dae_trist
|
dae_trist Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Singapore and Taiwan would probably join China in a war against a third aggressor nation, especially if relations continue to warm. It's a foregone conclusion that China isn't going to start any wars with anyone soon, it's simply not in their interest.
-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
|
Testerion  Posts: 549
Registered: 2001-12-28 03:07:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
China will be busy exploiting african countries for at least decade or two more.
-----signature-----
|
dae_trist Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
If by "exploit" you mean "stabilizing and enriching" then you're right.
The nations that see the most Chinese involvement (save Zambia and their Western backed propaganda wings) also have the most pro-Chinese publics.
edit: wrong country
-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
|
reesescups Title: //Captain America
Posts: 2,537
Registered: 2003-5-26 14:45:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
dae_trist posted:
Singapore and Taiwan would probably join China in a war against a third aggressor nation, especially if relations continue to warm. It's a foregone conclusion that China isn't going to start any wars with anyone soon, it's simply not in their interest.
You think Taiwan would join China if China and the US went toe to toe? Really, that's what you think?
Is that why I get free BJ's in Taiwan when I say I am an American?
-----signature-----
"man up, you wimp." - Groucho48
"I'm not racist at all." - dae_trist
|
Moe_Nox Title: In Moe We Trust
Posts: 1,962
Registered: 2007-2-4 12:17:56
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Reese that is simply part of Twatter's programming, that Taiwan is merely a confused Chinese state, a bit wayward due to American influence. So delusional 
-----signature-----
The Nanny State cometh
Currency should be bacon cheeseburgers and blow jobs... - Reese
Life at the Outpost: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1771556 |
Tipztoe Posts: 1,775
Registered: 2004-3-1 17:53:43
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
|
china doesn't need military invasions.. the current population invasions are working very well.
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Moe_Nox posted:
Altra_Shadowstalker posted:
China would have to invade Mexico, which would be unwilling to allow them a forward base, so they'd be drawn into the war if China went that route and Canada has no chance of lending them aid.
Ok, I will give you the out of thinking hypothetically of some distant time when China has these mythical capabilities, because as of now, currently, there is no friggin way they can project that kind of power. They simply do not have the means to do any large scale amphibious D-day type assault.
They might arguably be capable of traveling to Taiwan and emerging victorious on a beach landing. Maybe.
Mexico? Canada?
I wasn't particularly clear on that point. I was getting at the US and China are both pretty safe from land invasion. We only have Mexico and Canada boardering us and Canada surely isn't going to aid the Chinese. I doubt Mexico would either, but they have helped our enemies in the past.
As for "sides" I wasn't speaking of military aid for a lot of those countries I listed. Australia might help with some troops, but the key is they would stop trading, at least mostly, with China. That goes for most of the developed world.
-----signature-----
"Goddammit, Swearengen, I don't trust you as far as I could th'ow you, but I enjoy the way you lie."
I don't typo often, but when I do, I blame Swype.
|
|
