| Author |
Topic:
Why China would win. [Locked] |
Thugoneous  Title: Watching Caliente, BRB.
Posts: 1,128
Registered: 2002-11-2 18:00:54
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Carriers deploy in strike groups for a reason. China's subtlest is much more dangerous to a strike force. Also wind can ruin a. Carriers ability to rein death from above.
-----signature-----
Lady, people aren't chocolates. D'you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.
|
reesescups Title: //Captain America
Posts: 2,537
Registered: 2003-5-26 14:45:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
GrymmDAOC posted:
... but China is still very vulnerable to interdiction of its resource and oil supplies.
Is there where we rehash Japan circa WWII
-----signature-----
"man up, you wimp." - Groucho48
"I'm not racist at all." - dae_trist
|
Moe_Nox Title: In Moe We Trust
Posts: 1,962
Registered: 2007-2-4 12:17:56
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
All I see is conventional thinking so far, which would play a minimal role in a war with China.
-----signature-----
The Nanny State cometh
Currency should be bacon cheeseburgers and blow jobs... - Reese
Life at the Outpost: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1771556 |
imaloon1  Posts: 674
Registered: 2003-9-15 07:19:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
A combined China/Russia first strike is inevitable.
-----signature-----
The time draws nearer to your fate
|
Koneg Title: Evil Genius
Posts: 894
Registered: 2001-12-4 15:31:28
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
imaloon1 posted:
A combined China/Russia first strike is inevitable.
As China and Russia have absolutely zero reason to attack us your sense of inevitability is somewhat flawed.
-----signature-----
* First rule of a gun fight: Have a gun.
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke
|
imaloon1 Posts: 674
Registered: 2003-9-15 07:19:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Neither did Iraq and they had WMD'S!!!!
-----signature-----
The time draws nearer to your fate
|
Testerion Posts: 549
Registered: 2001-12-28 03:07:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Tipztoe posted:
Testerion posted:
China would win because USA wouldn't be able to go to China for funds needed to use all that snappy technology.
but it would also cut off US from buying all the Chinese crap we do, hence a good source of revenue.
China is used to starving its people, USA isnt.
-----signature-----
|
GrymmDAOC  Posts: 241
Registered: 2001-12-6 13:04:16
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Testerion posted:
Tipztoe posted:
Testerion posted:
China would win because USA wouldn't be able to go to China for funds needed to use all that snappy technology.
but it would also cut off US from buying all the Chinese crap we do, hence a good source of revenue.
China is used to starving its people, USA isnt.
The USA is quite capable of feeding itself.
-----signature-----
Now speccing 2h sword IRL.
|
Kordirn Title: Pirate Prince
Posts: 1,513
Registered: 2004-4-19 01:15:26
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
Testerion posted:
Tipztoe posted:
Testerion posted:
China would win because USA wouldn't be able to go to China for funds needed to use all that snappy technology.
but it would also cut off US from buying all the Chinese crap we do, hence a good source of revenue.
China is used to starving its people, USA isnt.
True but the population of the usa could last longer than the population of china without food.
-----signature-----
ooOooo oOoOO OOo
|
Clackdor Posts: 163
Registered: 2001-9-21 12:10:52
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why China would win. |
We EXPORT food and have an obesity problem. America will never starve. 
-----signature-----
If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.
|
|
