VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Why China would win. [Locked]
Tipztoe  4 stars
Posts: 1,775
Registered: 2004-3-1 17:53:43
dae_trist posted:

eodoll posted:

So china would have to drop 25 nukes? Wed blow most of those up in the sky.



you think America's missile defense system actually works? China could easily churn out 10,000s of missiles and launch all of them. You'd have to get lucky and find the ones with the warheads.


eodoll posted:

We could easily destroy the lives of 800 million people in a few seonds. That seems like a giant soft spot for china.



And China could easily wipe America off the face of the earth. There'd still be a few million Chinese people left, and tens of millions outside of China. Not to mention that a nuclear attack on Southwest China is a nuclear attack on India and Southeast Asia, as 70-80% of the water they drink and use for agriculture originates from there. That, and any airborne contamination will make its way to South Korea and Japan within a few weeks if not days through the atmosphere, and actually deposit in California if they're light enough.



you sound angry
pretty typical
Bobvillas  3 stars
Posts: 643
Registered: 2008-11-19 12:56:18
This is an awesome Starcraft thread.

I want to be Terrans.

I like a challenge.

 

-----signature-----
"well honestly i didnt learn "jw" on the net i learned it from multiple females that have texted me. but keep on truckin broheim." Thorikos
http://fluffytit.mybrute.com
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
eodoll posted:

It would be hopeless. The chinese would lose.

We firebombed the hell out of japan and then we nuked them. It was hopeless for japan.

We have a lot more firepower this time. No chance for china in a war.



Japan didn't have nukes when they got nuked, nor the resources to mount a respectable defense or project naval/air power. That, and Tokyo was full of wooden buildings and lies flat and crowded on lowlands.

Whip out your world map.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
Tipztoe posted:

you sound angry
pretty typical



You sound stupid, but that comes as no surprise. I'm more surprised and amused than anything.

You are asspained because you know every single thing I say is true.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
Testerion  3 stars
Posts: 549
Registered: 2001-12-28 03:07:47
eodoll posted:

So china would have to drop 25 to a 100 nukes to kill 50 mil people? Wed blow most of those up in the sky.

We could easily destroy the lives of 800 million people in a few seonds using our submarines that are hanging out by china this minute.



Last I checked, best US missle defense can block 1 out of 3 ICBMs. When you got 200 of them flying toward you, thats not really comforting...there is no winners in nuclear war, if there were, mushroom clouds would be every day thing.


and China is friggin HUGE and sparsely populated plus they hold little regard to human life, on other hand you guys would freak out after first bomb.

 

-----signature-----
eodoll  4 stars
Posts: 1,028
Registered: 2002-2-14 12:35:42
dae_trist posted:

eodoll posted:

It would be hopeless. The chinese would lose.

We firebombed the hell out of japan and then we nuked them. It was hopeless for japan.

We have a lot more firepower this time. No chance for china in a war.



Japan didn't have nukes when they got nuked, nor the resources to mount a respectable defense or project naval/air power. That, and Tokyo was full of wooden buildings and lies flat and crowded on lowlands.

Whip out your world map.



My point is our firebombing killed even more people than our nuke did but we still used it.

We invented the nuclear bomb just to show our power during that war.

Wed invent an even more intense weapon if we felt the pressure to do so.
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
eodoll posted:

My point is our firebombing killed even more people than our nuke did but we still used it.

We invented the nuclear bomb just to show our power during that war.

Wed invent an even more intense weapon if we felt the pressure to do so.



Firebombing, for obvious reasons, is not going to work well on China.

As for the last line, America has severely declined intellectually since then.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
Tych2  4 stars
Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
Tipztoe posted:

you sound angry
pretty typical

I've been saying this for awhile now. I am a pretty good read of people.

 

-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks
eodoll  4 stars
Posts: 1,028
Registered: 2002-2-14 12:35:42
Germanys best and brightest came here. Chances are chinas best and brightest woukd come here to fight on our side as well.
dae_trist  4 stars
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
Tych2 posted:

I am a pretty good read of people.



Everyone says this.

 

-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.