Quote:
posted:Besides that, it is a TERRIBLE analogy. If Pac-Man rewarded you in a way that would make botting advantageous in some way, there would most CERTAINLY be a bot for it. One game of Pac-Man doesn't build on the last, which means there is no point to botting.
if only i'd said that same thing! oh wait i did! ("it's about games that build slowly over time."
my whole point is that pac man doesn't get botted since it doesn't build on itself. congrats on understanding what i said, even though you think you thought of it youself...
Quote:
posted:All of the above games you mentioned had at least one cheat/hack associated with them, including pac man.
oh i'm sure they did... what i said was "i've never heard..." which was a shorthand way of saying "it's not that popular a thing to do to bot those games, even though i'm sure someone has done it, just to do it"
Quote:
posted:It's still laziness. Nothing in the world forces you to... PLAY a video GAME.
of course it's laziness.
nothing in world forces you to... NOT BE LAZY when playing a video GAME.
many people play video games expressly to be lazy. i'd even posit that the MAJORITY of people play video GAMES to be lazy.
the only reason more people don't bot video games is because they're being LAZY. too lazy to go out, find hacks, install them, live in fear of getting caught, etc, etc... people aren't "not botting" video games out of some sense of fairness or work ethic, it's just that they're too lazy to figure out how to bot the game.
- if botting was built into the game do you think most people would do it? of course they would.
- if making your character any level with any gear was built into the game do you think most people would do it? of course they would.
most players of a game are lazy.
Quote:
posted:If you have to cheat to have fun, wouldn't it be better not to play at all, and play another game instead?
no.
why?
if botting a game (whether doing do is cheating or not) leads to the most fun for a person, why would they not do that?