VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only? [Locked]
OldBitterCraig
Title: EXTERMINATE!
Posts: 4
Registered: 2002-8-22 16:41:13
nope. agree wiht the LK sentiment, though. that was fun... i had not tired.

hate so many cata bits that only my desire for 100 mounts and 100,000 hks on one toon is keeping me in the game at present.

 

-----signature-----
85 everything. weeee.
.
i've always been a nobody, i'll never be a somebody
unless i kick some ass or get drink with the umbrella in it.
Elaok  2 stars
Title: I has title now!
Posts: 404
Registered: 2003-9-10 15:57:29
Vanilla? no i leveled my warlock up in Vanilla i don't think i could do 1-60 again like that..

BC? maybe...


WOTLK? sure why not i had the most fun playing WOTLK expansion moer than the others and anything to get rid of the current expansion
Auenwing  3 stars
Title: straightface
Posts: 589
Registered: 2002-12-27 23:23:12
Sprawl-zero1eye- posted:

40-man raids? Ugh no thanks. 25-mans are already 24 too many at times.






/crawls back onto chair

 

-----signature-----
There are those who play tank classes, and those that tank.
The weapon is only as good as the person wielding it.
Free advice is often worth what you pay for it: nothing.
Rill_of_WE  3 stars
Title: WoW Vault Site Manager
Posts: 557
Registered: 2002-8-6 09:16:33
I would not. I might dabble on it just for nostalgia's sake. But since my favorite class/spec is ret paladin, I'd rather lock it to BC or WotLK when it was more fun to play.

 

-----signature-----
sarnsereg  1 star
Title: I HAS A TITLE?
Posts: 117
Registered: 2001-6-17 21:19:51
While I have some very fond memeories of vanilla(even beta) I wouldn't play on a vanilla locked server. Well, maybe for a little bit, but I wouldn't stay long enough to make it worth them opening one.

I loved 40 man raids, they were fun and challenging and really felt like an accomplishment. The newer styles (10 and 25) don't seem to provide me with the same sense of fulfillment that the 40 man raids did when we down bosses. It's still fun and enjoyable but something about 40 people going into an instance and coordinating everything was truely epic in the sense of a "raid".

That being said.... I hated grinding mobs for items to sell to have enough gold to buy a 100% speed LAND mount (it took me a long time to grind the money out for the 1,000G when i was lucky to get an item that was like a 15s vendor price). I enjoy being able to fly everywhere now. I remember getting my Dungeon set and enjoyed it, but as it has already been brought up you ran the same one or two instances at a point hoping to get that last piece (and i had it all.. forl ike 2 weeks until i started upgrading with MC pieces, then with BWD pieces until i had all the BWD stuff, then was about to staart upgrading naxx pieces, but only got one piece and didn't want to lose my set bonus from my BWD piece)


That and the talent trees and everything are so different now and I like it the way they are now. My druid can legitimatly tank, dps, or heal where in vanilla you healed and that was that, paladins were cleanse bots and that was that, shamans were healers and that was that, warriors were tanks and you tanked or you didn't do anything, priests were healers and shadow was laughed at other than for leveling purposes, etc. etc.


Anyways, just some of the reasons as to why I wouldn't play a server locked to vanilla content.

 

-----signature-----
"...and they'll say "Hey, Look at him!, I'll never live that way". And that's ok they couldn't anyway..."
Tai-Daishar_MT  2 stars
Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator

Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
Not a chance. Wrath was good times (before the buff got too high) so it is a bit of a bummer at the letdown known as cat.

 

-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
siujoey  2 stars
Posts: 280
Registered: 2001-12-26 09:10:44
I'm with Quazi. Since I don't need to seek validation from the game by feeling like I "achieved" something, I would play the expansion that I had the most fun in. That would be WotLK. Easy or not, special needs or not- that was fun, and that's what I am looking for from a game.

 

-----signature-----
I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Broken_Kayfabe  1 star
Posts: 248
Registered: 2002-2-16 01:05:01
Not original. TBC or WotLK maybe. However with the butchered community and no sense of world anymore thanks to integrating all the servers and turning everything into random queues, I can't see either of those either. Now a WotLK or TBC without server integration - mm that would be tempting.

 

-----signature-----
Thanks, but it's been fun
Five more minutes then I'm done!
I've been saying that to myself since
...yesterday.
- from "Has anybody seen my corpse". Man Everquest rocked back in the day...
Spookysheep  4 stars
Title: Lieker of Cheese
Posts: 1,248
Registered: 2002-1-9 06:49:19
I would play on a WOTLK server, especially if they made it co-op.

 

-----signature-----
I liek cheese
Pirates > Ninjas
.....................................
_Kewk_  2 stars
Title: Sith Lord
Posts: 400
Registered: 2002-12-17 16:11:04
Arcilite_I posted:

Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?



No

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.