| Author |
Topic:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down [Locked] |
ZigmundZag  Title: Grammar Nazi
Posts: 1,211
Registered: 2002-3-25 23:03:00
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
If he wasn't detained, how is it unlawful detention?
-----signature-----
"Take the cheese to sickbay!"
|
Tipztoe Posts: 1,775
Registered: 2004-3-1 17:53:43
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
theredkay1 posted:
+
How were any of those violated? I think the TSA is largely a waste of resources, but your argument doesnt work.
the government does not have the right to detain and search you without probable cause or a warrant
you mad?
|
Koneg  Title: Evil Genius
Posts: 894
Registered: 2001-12-4 15:31:28
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
Bowlartz posted:
You have no right to fly on a plane.
It's a good thing then that this has absolutely nothing to do with flying on planes.
-----signature-----
* First rule of a gun fight: Have a gun.
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke
|
-Espiritu-  Posts: 269
Registered: 2004-11-29 18:27:00
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
It is amazing to see an Obama-acolyte like theredkay1 embrace illegal detentions. Obama ran on the idea that President Bush's administration had gone too far in this regard, and then his own administration went even further down the rabbit hole.
-----signature-----
Espiritu - SWTOR (retired)
Espiritu (MajorMUD, UO, DAoC, SB, FFXI, WoW, WAR, Travian, SC2, SWTOR)
|
Tipztoe Posts: 1,775
Registered: 2004-3-1 17:53:43
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
|
I'll add, if the airport wants security, they should be paying for it themselves, and the people who use the service.
Why should people who don't fly have to pay for TSA to exist? (tax payers)
it stinks all the way around.
|
Taliesihne Title: Wind on the Deep Waters
Posts: 1,117
Registered: 2004-2-19 04:47:59
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
Rights are not granted to you based on what you are engaged in. You are born with them. They are absolute.
You are born having the right to be free from illegal government detainment. Whether you are engaged in compulsory government service or are taking a trip to Bermuda is irrelevant.
-----signature-----
Jesus saves, Allah protects, and Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. -Roland Deschain, of Gilead
|
Sea_of_inK Posts: 488
Registered: 2004-10-18 12:57:37
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
-Espiritu- posted:
http://youtu.be/2XhnZlmLGK8
unlawful detention
Why would putting your breast milk through a scanner be that big of a deal? If you don't want to do that then put it in the correct sized containers.
I don't understand why there is so much resentment towards airport security. Do you all not see the purpose? Bowlartz I remember to be a mega fascist when discussing OWS but he's dead on right on this. If a police officer wants to breathalize you, he can, and if the airport security wants to pat you down or scan your breast milk, than they can.
If protocol is not followed or a TSA agent does not act professionally than there may be a legitimate complaint, but beyond that I don't have much sympathy. What do you all wish was different exactly?
Should there be no airport security? Do you think that if airlines provided the security instead of the gubmint things would be different?
*also she could've left at any time. That's not 'detention'.
-----signature-----
|
Brother_Tempus Title: Patriot
Posts: 985
Registered: 2001-1-9 08:07:00
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
Bowlartz posted:
He was never detained.
You have no right to fly on a plane.
The freedom to travel is an inalienable right. Government has no power to stop you from boarding a plane that you have contracted.
-----signature-----
You win ACF, dude - Osmenthe
BT is usually right - Onslaught
i think we need more BT on page 1 - FighterUSAF
Yep, BT is right - Aerlinthian
Got guns & ammo? Food? Precious metals?
|
Bowlartz  Title: Offical VN Tin Foil Hat Supplier
Posts: 221
Registered: 2006-1-4 19:59:15
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
" You have no right to fly on a plane.
It's a good thing then that this has absolutely nothing to do with flying on planes. "
It kinda does when people insist that their rights to unreasonable search are being violated when attempting to...fly on a plane. There is no unreasonable search involved. DUI Check points have been upheld by the SCOTUS more than once and easily mimic what is going on with the TSA and flying on planes.
"The freedom to travel is an inalienable right."
Method of said travel is in no way covered in the US Constitution, therefor it is left up to the legislative branch and has been held up by the US Supreme Court.
-----signature-----
Fellow Conservatives, put your money
where your forum mouth is...
http://www.kiva.org/
Lend a little to entrepreneurs around the world so
that they can show the world how it works... |
Scarne Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts: 1,087
Registered: 2001-7-23 15:24:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
TSA detains Rand Paul after he refuses pat down |
Sea_of_inK posted:
I don't understand why there is so much resentment towards airport security. Do you all not see the purpose? Bowlartz I remember to be a mega fascist when discussing OWS but he's dead on right on this. If a police officer wants to breathalize you, he can, and if the airport security wants to pat you down or scan your breast milk, than they can.
TSA agents are not officers of the law. 
-----signature-----
E Pluribus Unum
|
|
