| Author |
Topic:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? [Locked] |
Elkad  Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts: 407
Registered: 2003-9-11 22:20:55
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
LOL. Mangy with the masturbation argument again.
If you are going to use that argument, then a woman who allowed an egg to leave her body without being fertilized would be guilty of the same crime. Sex would be mandatory every month for every fertile woman.
So we'd be jailing 9yr olds for not getting knocked up.
Nobody has ever seriously proposed any limit earlier than conception/fertilization. And at some point the risk to the mother's health becomes a triage issue, where the doctor has to save one or the other.
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
Kathea  Title: meh.
Posts: 140
Registered: 2003-7-24 02:10:37
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
Manegarm posted:
That looks like life to me, and if male Christians and other idiots wants too preserve life and ban abortion they will also have to inact laws that makes masturbation for men illegal.
But that will never happen BECAUSE THAT WOULD INFRINGE ON THE FREEDOMS OF MEN..
all of this religious social conservative bullshit is just patriarchal misogyny, if the roles were reversed Abortion would not even be a issue.
srsly
If men were the ones carrying the little parasites around for nine months, abortion would be legal, free and clear. No questions asked.
It's too bad we're not seahorses.
|
Manegarm  Title: European Imperialist Good Guy
Posts: 1,964
Registered: 2003-8-11 10:01:52
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
Elkad posted:
LOL. Mangy with the masturbation argument again.
If you are going to use that argument, then a woman who allowed an egg to leave her body without being fertilized would be guilty of the same crime. Sex would be mandatory every month for every fertile woman.
So we'd be jailing 9yr olds for not getting knocked up.
Nobody has ever seriously proposed any limit earlier than conception/fertilization. And at some point the risk to the mother's health becomes a triage issue, where the doctor has to save one or the other.
The egg is inert it does not show signs of life.. Your argument is invalid, sperms are the life spark. Pro-lifers should abstain from jerking off because it's worse then abortion it's mass murder.
The pro-life argument is distilled misogynistic idiocy wrapped in a cloak of religious retardation, as I said if it was men that needed abortions this would never have been a issue.
-----signature-----
Europa Eternita!
"Damn, Manegarm; you are HAWT!! " - Taolynn
"To the everlasting glory of the infantry, Shines the name Shines the name of Rodger Young"
ALWAYS ANGRY, ALL THE TIME!
Nein mann ich will noch nicht gehen
|
Manegarm Title: European Imperialist Good Guy
Posts: 1,964
Registered: 2003-8-11 10:01:52
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
Kathea posted:
Manegarm posted:
That looks like life to me, and if male Christians and other idiots wants too preserve life and ban abortion they will also have to inact laws that makes masturbation for men illegal.
But that will never happen BECAUSE THAT WOULD INFRINGE ON THE FREEDOMS OF MEN..
all of this religious social conservative bullshit is just patriarchal misogyny, if the roles were reversed Abortion would not even be a issue.
srsly
If men were the ones carrying the little parasites around for nine months, abortion would be legal, free and clear. No questions asked.
It's too bad we're not seahorses.
There is a reason why a clear majority of criminals are men, we're barbarians, cavemen trapped in a age of reasoning that we're not designed for.
-----signature-----
Europa Eternita!
"Damn, Manegarm; you are HAWT!! " - Taolynn
"To the everlasting glory of the infantry, Shines the name Shines the name of Rodger Young"
ALWAYS ANGRY, ALL THE TIME!
Nein mann ich will noch nicht gehen
|
eodoll Posts: 1,028
Registered: 2002-2-14 12:35:42
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
|
It makes no sense.. It shouldnt be double homcide. Maybe taking a womans choice away, but then women who say theyre on the pill but arent should be imprisoned too for taking the mans choice away.
|
Manegarm Title: European Imperialist Good Guy
Posts: 1,964
Registered: 2003-8-11 10:01:52
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
eodoll posted:
It makes no sense.. It shouldnt be double homcide. Maybe taking a womans choice away, but then women who say theyre on the pill but arent should be imprisoned too for taking the mans choice away.
It does; she is carrying a life inside her that she is the arbiter of not anyone else it's her burden, if you snuff out that life without her consent you should go to jail for murder, it's very simple.
The man should simply not have to take responsibility if she lies about the pill, the solution is easy; use a condom practice safe responsible sex with people who are not insane.
-----signature-----
Europa Eternita!
"Damn, Manegarm; you are HAWT!! " - Taolynn
"To the everlasting glory of the infantry, Shines the name Shines the name of Rodger Young"
ALWAYS ANGRY, ALL THE TIME!
Nein mann ich will noch nicht gehen
|
eodoll Posts: 1,028
Registered: 2002-2-14 12:35:42
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
|
I disagree with you-
She is carrying a life that isnt 100% hers.. It took two seperate humans to make it.
The choice belongs to two people.
I think abortion should only be allowed by choice in the first 4 months, after that its health of the mother or unborn child only that should allow an abortion.
|
Testerion  Posts: 549
Registered: 2001-12-28 03:07:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
To leeberals campaigning free abortion...CONDOMS, FUCKING USE THEM.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
for me it hinges on your christian definition of life.
there is no soul people.
untill the child can survive on its own, outside of the womb it is a parasite and can be killed just like a cockroach would be.
begin with your semantics games now and try to redefine life based on whatever you wish, but you can not deny that a fetus will not live outside the womb without drastic and very expensive medical intervention.
seperation of church and state requires that you leave your soul talk and magic mumbo jumbo at the door when crafting laws.
maybe we could institute a law that says aborted fetuses are removed and placed on lifesupport in some christian prolifer establishment.
funded solely by prolifers.
-----signature-----
Jesus? No, but there is indeed a god shaped hole in the heart of man, why is yours so empty? -- snarf igraine
the original monotheism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallus |
Elkad Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts: 407
Registered: 2003-9-11 22:20:55
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Why do we nitpick on abortion? |
sweeny_comodore posted:
for me it hinges on your christian definition of life.
there is no soul people.
untill the child can survive on its own, outside of the womb it is a parasite and can be killed just like a cockroach would be.
So we can kill it until it can provide it's own food/shelter. Got it. The eastern practice of leaving girl babies out in the cold be eaten by wild dogs is just an abortion.
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
