You apparently didnt read the NEJM's reviews of those books, the reviewers from the NEJM used it many times. No matter here is some source material from medline/pubmed, all medical and science journals.
Material translations in the Cartesian brain. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Mar;43(1):244-55. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
From the abstract: "This article reconsiders the theoretical obligations placed on the pineal gland as the site of the soul-body union, and looks at how the gland was consequently forced to adopt a very precarious ontological status."
Left atrial function predicts heart failure hospitalization in subjects with preserved ejection fraction and coronary heart disease longitudinal data from the heart and soul study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 14;59(7):673-80
The price of your soul: neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):754-62.
etc etc
Science can not comment on qualia, it can't comment on counter-factuals, it can't comment on positive claims (what should happen), it can't comment on aesthetic claims, science can't comment on fictional worlds, science can't comment on empirically identical claims, etc.
Whether you want to admit or not, you love philosophy, because all the fun, beautiful, wonderful, and important things are only answered this way. You seek to live life to the fullest manny, I choose to do it a different way and I have a lot of fun and satisfaction.




