| Author |
Topic:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime [Locked] |
Gaevren Title: Wat do?
Posts: 1,181
Registered: 2004-9-15 09:29:36
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Calling this a hate crime is one of the stupidest judgments ever.
He saw his roomie kissing another guy on the webcam. Made a tweet which read as "unenthusiastic" to me, not hateful. Just more like "whoa not what I was expecting to see there".
As for the "viewing party", so what? I would bet you money that if his roomie had been straight, and the webcam set up, he would have still tried to arrange for such, and he probably would have watched a lot longer on the first webcam.
Invasion of privacy yes. Hate crime, no way. Bet he would have done the exact same thing if his roommate had been straight and making out with a girl.
-----signature-----
There are no automatic doors, just very polite ninjas
|
the_great_ontex Title: This is what cool looks like
Posts: 791
Registered: 2012-2-13 18:38:12
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
|
Why does anyone give a crap that he is a Rutgers student?
|
Chogram Posts: 945
Registered: 2001-8-23 02:52:32
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
|
If it was a straight guy with an ugly chick? Nobody would have cared.
If it was a guy with a black chick? Nobody would have cared.
Two guys? OMG HATE CRIME UP TO 10 YEARS IN PRISON.
****ing stupid.
|
Kordirn Title: Pirate Prince
Posts: 1,513
Registered: 2004-4-19 01:15:26
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Perhaps he would of had a viewing party either way but his intent would of been different.
-----signature-----
ooOooo oOoOO OOo
|
NonOffensiveName Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts: 830
Registered: 2001-10-7 19:39:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
the_great_ontex posted:
Why does anyone give a crap that he is a Rutgers student?
bcs thats the college that it happened at
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW?
A: A whore that likes attention
|
NonOffensiveName Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts: 830
Registered: 2001-10-7 19:39:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Gaevren posted:
Calling this a hate crime is one of the stupidest judgments ever. He saw his roomie kissing another guy on the webcam. Made a tweet which read as "unenthusiastic" to me, not hateful. Just more like "whoa not what I was expecting to see there". As for the "viewing party", so what? I would bet you money that if his roomie had been straight, and the webcam set up, he would have still tried to arrange for such, and he probably would have watched a lot longer on the first webcam. Invasion of privacy yes. Hate crime, no way. Bet he would have done the exact same thing if his roommate had been straight and making out with a girl.
Im betting not since he roomate knew that the gay guy had been having guy friends over. He pretty much set up the web cam to catch him being gay.
and why would he tweet about it and tell his friends to come and watch the second time if his intent wasnt to humiliate his roommate in the first place?
its really not that hard to understand but Im loving all the sympathy for the STILL alive straight guy from everyone
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW?
A: A whore that likes attention
|
Gaevren Title: Wat do?
Posts: 1,181
Registered: 2004-9-15 09:29:36
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
NonOffensiveName posted:
Gaevren posted:
Calling this a hate crime is one of the stupidest judgments ever. He saw his roomie kissing another guy on the webcam. Made a tweet which read as "unenthusiastic" to me, not hateful. Just more like "whoa not what I was expecting to see there". As for the "viewing party", so what? I would bet you money that if his roomie had been straight, and the webcam set up, he would have still tried to arrange for such, and he probably would have watched a lot longer on the first webcam. Invasion of privacy yes. Hate crime, no way. Bet he would have done the exact same thing if his roommate had been straight and making out with a girl.
Im betting not since he roomate knew that the gay guy had been having guy friends over. He pretty much set up the web cam to catch him being gay.
and why would he tweet about it and tell his friends to come and watch the second time if his intent wasnt to humiliate his roommate in the first place?
its really not that hard to understand but Im loving all the sympathy for the STILL alive straight guy from everyone 
Yep because this kind of thing has never happened to a straight guy making out with a girl, ever ever. Every single person on the planet would totally respect that a guy was gonna have a girl over and not sneakily set up a webcam to watch and/or make fun of later. No no, clearly it ONLY happens to gays and it must be a hate crime.
-----signature-----
There are no automatic doors, just very polite ninjas
|
_sooz_ Posts: 1,256
Registered: 2004-12-4 11:40:44
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Gaevren posted:
Calling this a hate crime is one of the stupidest judgments ever.
He saw his roomie kissing another guy on the webcam. Made a tweet which read as "unenthusiastic" to me, not hateful. Just more like "whoa not what I was expecting to see there".
As for the "viewing party", so what? I would bet you money that if his roomie had been straight, and the webcam set up, he would have still tried to arrange for such, and he probably would have watched a lot longer on the first webcam.
Invasion of privacy yes. Hate crime, no way. Bet he would have done the exact same thing if his roommate had been straight and making out with a girl.
Yup, but because the guy was gay it has to be called a "hate crime". If their roles had been reversed, it wouldnt have been. The gay guy would have just been called immature and it would have been left at that.
-----signature-----
|
Caledric Title: Pew! Pew! Pew!
Posts: 1,327
Registered: 2001-12-22 07:59:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Don't you guys realize you are committing a hate crime by disagreeing with Non? Anytime you do something that a gay doesn't like its a hate crime.
-----signature-----
Planetside 2 -- Outcasters "As One"
Marmot BR 0 (waiting for beta!)
|
Poit-Narf Title: Cleric of Juan
Posts: 186
Registered: 2004-7-11 11:45:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Ex-Rutgers student guilty of hate crime |
Caledric posted:
Don't you guys realize you are committing a hate crime by disagreeing with Non? Anytime you do something that a gay doesn't like its a hate crime.
Non disagrees with me all the time. That makes him guilty of a hate crime, right?
-----signature-----
"I think so, Brain, but there's still a bug stuck in here from last time."
Rift: Deepstrike/Guardian
Poit (Mage), Point (Rogue), Popit (Cleric), Poiyt (Warrior)
http://immortal-guild.com/
"  ou're so heterophobic" -Lyli
|
|