| Author |
Topic:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... [Locked] |
Shimatta33 Posts: 142
Registered: 2003-11-19 23:55:28
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Yukishiro1 posted:
Shimatta33 posted:
I can't agree with you there. For many employers a high school diploma (even a university one often times) is often viewed as more of a reflection on your ability to follow through with commitments and complete tasks rather than how much you actually know about something. If an employer decides that a high school diploma is a benchmark then they should be allowed to set it as a benchmark as long as they do so consistently.
So is this the "special exception" rationale? What if they wanted to require a B.A. for their garbage collectors? What about an MA? A PhD? Is all of that fine, when you know the result of that is going to be a bunch of disabled and minority people who could do the job perfectly well being screened out of the job?
Yep, that'd be just fine for me. If that's the benchmark that they believe that they need for their business to be successful then so be it as long as they are consistent in their hiring policies with it. They just can't say that so-and-so would require a PhD but the average white-guy with a high school diploma is ok. Good luck for them finding people with a BA, MA, or PhD that will accept the position. There's a reason why low income jobs usually only require a high school diploma if anything at all and it's not because of worrying about discrimination.
-----signature-----
'tis an ill wind that blows no minds...
|
Yukishiro1 Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
|
I think your analogy shows you may be misunderstanding the issue, Shim. The EEOC didn't say you can't consider a high school diploma a plus in a hiring decision (assuming there is some reasonable basis for considering it a plus - probably not hard to do for any reasonably long-term job on the basis that it shows commitment and reliability). It just said you can't make it an absolute bar unless there is a defensible business nececssity for doing so.
The correct analogy would be a job posting which read "only those with an Ivy League degree will be considered."
|
Tych2 Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
I am still not hiring someone who doesn't have a HS diploma.
-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks
|
Shimatta33 Posts: 142
Registered: 2003-11-19 23:55:28
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Yukishiro1 posted:
I think your analogy shows you may be misunderstanding the issue, Shim. The EEOC didn't say you can't consider a high school diploma a plus in a hiring decision (assuming there is some reasonable basis for considering it a plus - probably not hard to do for any reasonably long-term job on the basis that it shows commitment and reliability). It just said you can't make it an absolute bar unless there is a defensible business nececssity for doing so.
The correct analogy would be a job posting which read "only those with an Ivy League degree will be considered."
You're right, I only glanced at the piece and this thread as I am working. I missed the "defensible business necessity" part. If that's the case then this is really a complete and total non-issue. The letter has no teeth in the first place. Commitment and reliability alone would be a directly relate to pretty much any position a company would be hiring for so I don't see how this would get enforced even if it were implemented as an actual law unless it was a situation such as the one that I described before where only some people are required to have a high school degree. I'd love to see a committee try and determine which positions "legitimately" require a high school diploma instead of ones that don't.
I maintain my position that if a company decides to set an education level benchmark based upon their business needs (perceived or actual) that is something that shouldn't be taken away from them from the graduate level down to the high school/GED level as long as they are consistent. If a fast food restaurant believes as part as their strategy they will only be successful if they hire MBAs and they set that as their standard then they're entitled to do so. It doesn't sound like you completely disagree.
As a side note, there's a real problem in this country with people discriminating against those with a GED instead of a high school diploma as though it's a lesser achievement. That's an example of a truly equivalent diploma that employers will often unfairly overlook in favor of a high school diploma.
-----signature-----
'tis an ill wind that blows no minds...
|
Bobvillas Posts: 643
Registered: 2008-11-19 12:56:18
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Orwyn_Blackheart posted:
Bobvillas posted:
Orwyn_Blackheart posted:
Bobvillas posted:
I give Orwyn another month before he has himself so worked up into a lather that he gets banned completely.
What a train wreck.
you should train wreck your face........ right into my crotch...........
a/s/l?
Are you Shia or Sunni? I want to make sure I dress appropriately.
Wow  not content with proving earlier that you were racist, you continue again
Congratulations on being a backward human being, I bet your only this brave on the Outpost !
So should I bring the box cutter or the bomb vest?
-----signature-----
"well honestly i didnt learn "jw" on the net i learned it from multiple females that have texted me. but keep on truckin broheim." Thorikos
http://fluffytit.mybrute.com
|
Abaddon_Ambrosius Title: Retired Theurgist TL
Posts: 1,674
Registered: 2001-12-21 09:51:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Yukishiro1 posted:
there are plenty of jobs for which a high school diploma really ISN'T required or even remotely related. Construction, cleaning, collection being obvious exmaples.
You have yet to prove that. And if you can't prove it, there sure as hell needn't be a law for it.
-----signature-----
In the immortal words of Socrates - "I drank what?"
"God you guys suck at the internet - how can you fail to locate porn?!" - Eternal_Midnight
"Knowing means nothing." - Fat-badger
|
Yukishiro1 Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Abaddon_Ambrosius posted:
Yukishiro1 posted:
there are plenty of jobs for which a high school diploma really ISN'T required or even remotely related. Construction, cleaning, collection being obvious exmaples.
You have yet to prove that. And if you can't prove it, there sure as hell needn't be a law for it.
What is there to prove? And how would you expect someone to prove the negative?
The law is set up the way it is for a reason. It's the employer's job to justify why he thinks something is business necessity, not the employee's job to somehow disprove all possibilities.
An average janitor's job duties don't involve anything remotely requiring a diploma. You don't need a diploma to brush junk into a garbage can. They don't teach you anything in high school about that.
If the point is a high school diploma could be considered a plus - sure, it might be. But a REQUIREMENT? Of course not.
|
Clackdor Posts: 163
Registered: 2001-9-21 12:10:52
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
We'll have to hire a lawyer to look over our job wanted ads.
-----signature-----
If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.
|
Yukishiro1 Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
|
Only if you really want to support the lawyer.
Just look at your want ads and see if the requirements you are posting really have a connection to the job. Go down the list of the requirements and spell out a justification for each. If you can't come up with something that passes a basic sniff test that's a clue you might want to get a lawyer but otherwise I wouldn't waste your money.
|
Abaddon_Ambrosius Title: Retired Theurgist TL
Posts: 1,674
Registered: 2001-12-21 09:51:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:01am
Subject:
Good news to you Outposters..HS Diploma req. to be illegal... |
Yukishiro1 posted:
Abaddon_Ambrosius posted:
Yukishiro1 posted:
there are plenty of jobs for which a high school diploma really ISN'T required or even remotely related. Construction, cleaning, collection being obvious exmaples.
You have yet to prove that. And if you can't prove it, there sure as hell needn't be a law for it.
What is there to prove? And how would you expect someone to prove the negative?
WHERE did you study law and logic? Bloat? Figures.
The DEFAULT position of any sane employer is to ask about qualifications, work ethic and education. You are the one who needs to prove the positive... that it is necessary and valid to expend time, effort, and money to PREVENT that default action for certain jobs as regards (specifically) a high school diploma.
-----signature-----
In the immortal words of Socrates - "I drank what?"
"God you guys suck at the internet - how can you fail to locate porn?!" - Eternal_Midnight
"Knowing means nothing." - Fat-badger
|
|