Then you should have like 20 kids.


Of course, you first have to find a willing and breathing woman.

 

-----signature-----

We have a libertarian who thinks it is ok to take other peoples money and pay someone else to not have kids.

We have another who thinks that poor people should educate themselves and get high paying jobs. If the education is done through college they are looking at what, $20,000 a year? Where is a poor person going to get $20,000 a year? Student loans? And then, when they graduate with honors and are working at McDonald's because all the decent jobs are else where, what then? They will end up poorer.

Or maybe you are saying they should go to the library and educate themselves that way so they can apply for a job as an electrical engineer because they learned how to from the book, "Become and engineer in 28 days." or "Electrical Engineering for Dummies (and poor people)".

Our system is designed to have a large amount of poor people at the bottom. It keeps the schlubs like us busting our asses for nothing so we don't end up like that. We constantly produce more for less so we aren't the dude making $11,000 a year trying to support 3 kids.

Maybe we should stop looking at the group of people who are using the system and start looking at the parts of the systems that are leaching off of certain groups of people.

Sorry, I forgot you drank the kool-aid from the very people who are screwing us all.

 

-----signature-----

You guys think way too highly of yourselves. Having children is a human right period. I'm glad you tards have no say of what people can or cant do. You idiots would make the US worse than nazi germany.

 

-----signature-----

In your tiny little brain did it seem like someone said we should take away that right?

 

-----signature-----

Actually it would just be repurposing the money we already take from people. The goal of which would be to dramatically reduce the amount of future money we take from them.

Libertarians would run the country very differently from how the Republicrats do, but that doesn't mean it would be possible to just flip a switch and everything would be changed. You have to get there from here, and that would require transitional plans.

This would be a transitional plan, not a permanent policy.

 

-----signature-----

So saying they shouldn't have kids or cant have kids isn't taking away that right?

 

-----signature-----

How is having kids a right? Because they have the ability? They have the ability to choke you to death too... Should we let them do that too?

Eodoll do you seriously think the government should have the ability to decide whether or not law abiding citizens can breed?

 

-----signature-----

Eventually its necessary, look at india and china. They have too many people there and no infrastructure to support them - their social security system wont handle it either when the kids grow old.

Saying someone shouldn't do something doesn't constitute taking away a right. You shouldn't post here but I'm betting you will continue to exercise your right to do so anyways.

However, if I offered you $100 to stop posting here and you accepted the offer, it wouldn't be me taking away your right. It would be you choosing to give up that right voluntarily.

 

-----signature-----