Elkad posted:
How about going the old Wisconsin method? Open Carry only. I have a problem with being forced to pay for a permission slip for "shall not be infringed".
Paying for extra privileges (concealing) is OK by me, as long as there is a method for everyone to carry without paying.
Cawlin posted:
[I do agree though that the "may issue" status for some states for CCW permits needs to go. Issuing authorities in those states have created a de facto "will not issue" status. States must at the very least all become "shall issue" imo.
[I do agree though that the "may issue" status for some states for CCW permits needs to go. Issuing authorities in those states have created a de facto "will not issue" status. States must at the very least all become "shall issue" imo.
How about going the old Wisconsin method? Open Carry only. I have a problem with being forced to pay for a permission slip for "shall not be infringed".
Paying for extra privileges (concealing) is OK by me, as long as there is a method for everyone to carry without paying.
That'd be fine too, except open carry is a little messy. What happens when it's winter and you put your parka on? Now you're concealing...
Further, there are places that technically allow "open carry" but LEOs take the approach that if you insist on doing so, that they are going to do everything they can to make you change your mind, including wrongfully arresting you, just because they can, over and over and over, until you give up on it lol.
-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters



