| Author |
Topic:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) [Locked] |
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Sin_of_Onin posted:
Romney is a person who is really defined by his management experience. That is what you would be voting for. Candidates like RP are defined by their ideology. His ideology is bot based on study or intelligence but faith.
The Austrian economists called the crashes, your precious Keynesians not only failed but they failed spectacularly time and time again.
Oh and BTW, Romney whined that he lost money on the last crash. So much for his so called expertise.
|
cabbyman  Posts: 441
Registered: 2003-1-6 07:48:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
I have a very good life with the status quo. If nothing changes I will live a long, prosperous middle class life.
I am hoping for big changes before my kids get out on their own however.
-----signature-----
“No man’s life, liberty, or property are safe while the Legislature is in session.â€
"Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid." -- John Wayne
“If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace†- Thomas Paine
|
Brother_Tempus  Title: Patriot
Posts: 985
Registered: 2001-1-9 08:07:00
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Kjarhall posted:
The status quo sucks. Changing the status quo to  sucks more.
Give me a third party candidate without the and i'd strongly consider him/her.
The problem is what you think is not is the status quO only more of it
-----signature-----
You win ACF, dude - Osmenthe
BT is usually right - Onslaught
i think we need more BT on page 1 - FighterUSAF
Yep, BT is right - Aerlinthian
Got guns & ammo? Food? Precious metals?
|
Kjarhall Title: The Pungent One
Posts: 915
Registered: 2002-3-1 15:47:21
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Brother_Tempus posted:
Kjarhall posted:
The status quo sucks. Changing the status quo to sucks more.
Give me a third party candidate without the and i'd strongly consider him/her.
The problem is what you think is not is the status quO only more of it
Source?
-----signature-----
You're a crazy moron*
*http://vnboards.ign.com/outpost/b22180/115147923/r115151508/
hah! true story tho i'm a woman an i even love boobs..how can you not??- HallowEve
|
Special-Fred  Title: Sultan of Spank
Posts: 245
Registered: 2003-7-30 16:12:04
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Fine, then just give me a 3rd party candidate without supporters that are assholes about it. Ron paul supporters are the worst thing for his cause.
-----signature-----
|
theredkay1 Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Friarspam posted:
Hope and Change is a pretty stupid campaign slogan and it only attracts suckers.
In 2012 everyone should vote for Change and Hope. It will work this time.
Don't stop believin'!!
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
I have issues with some Ron Paul's ideas. I haven't counted out voting for him in the general election, depending on the debates.
What you're seeing from me on this board is blowback for being spoken of like a sheep for not falling in lock-step with his policies.
-----signature-----
"Goddammit, Swearengen, I don't trust you as far as I could th'ow you, but I enjoy the way you lie."
I don't typo often, but when I do, I blame Swype.
|
Groucho48 Posts: 821
Registered: 2003-10-22 03:00:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Any change isn't going to come from the top. You could put anyone you wanted in as President and things would move only a few degrees one way or another.
There has to be systemic change. Public financing would be huge. Everyone who says they want change should vote against any of their congressfolk who are especially close to our corporate overlords. I am almost certainly going to vote against my Senator Schumer next time. On a lot of issues, he's pretty good, but, he is way too closely tied to Wall Street. That's always been a problem with NYS Senators. Wall Street really likes, as LBJ used to put it, to have their peckers in its pocket.
Ron Paul has been in Congress forever and did he change anything there? No, he didn't. Why do you think that will change if he becomes President?
-----signature-----
“Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it.†– Richard Feynman
|
Bobvillas Posts: 643
Registered: 2008-11-19 12:56:18
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Sin_of_Onin posted:
Romney is a person who is really defined by his management experience. That is what you would be voting for.
The one person running that has experience in righting companies that are in the red. This is why a lot of us are willing to bet on him.
His record is definitely blemished, but out of the entire pool he is the only one that has shown that they can and will do what it takes to start our economic recovery.
I still say he needs to grab Huntsman to tie up the Independents and the disenfranchised Dems.
-----signature-----
"well honestly i didnt learn "jw" on the net i learned it from multiple females that have texted me. but keep on truckin broheim." Thorikos
http://fluffytit.mybrute.com
|
reesescups  Title: //Captain America
Posts: 2,537
Registered: 2003-5-26 14:45:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you like the status quo? (or...Man, there's a LOT of Ron Paul hate) |
Groucho48 posted:
Any change isn't going to come from the top. You could put anyone you wanted in as President and things would move only a few degrees one way or another.
There has to be systemic change. Public financing would be huge. Everyone who says they want change should vote against any of their congressfolk who are especially close to our corporate overlords. I am almost certainly going to vote against my Senator Schumer next time. On a lot of issues, he's pretty good, but, he is way too closely tied to Wall Street. That's always been a problem with NYS Senators. Wall Street really likes, as LBJ used to put it, to have their peckers in its pocket.
Ron Paul has been in Congress forever and did he change anything there? No, he didn't. Why do you think that will change if he becomes President?
The people voting out status quo and voting in Ron Paul would only happen if change had/has occurred from the ground up.
Be part of the change you are looking for - Vote Ron Paul 2012!!!
-----signature-----
"man up, you wimp." - Groucho48
"I'm not racist at all." - dae_trist
|
|
