VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Hypothetical: Is it stealing to take what is rightfully yours? [Locked]
Modeeb  4 stars
Title: A Ghost In The Machine
Posts: 1,258
Registered: 2002-4-19 10:48:36
Me being wrong is always a possibility.

 

-----signature-----
"What is here is there. What is not here is nowhere." Vishvasara Tantra
"Ever tried, Ever Failed. No matter. Try Again.
Fail Again. Fail Better. Samuel Beckett
paulg_68  4 stars
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
Cawlin posted:

Any other recourse you might take against them physically or by taking possession against his will of any of his other belongings or property is illegal.


I agreed from the start that it was illegal.

No need to beat that dead horse.

 

-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1
vn_nnanji  4 stars
Title: Outpost Music Expert
Posts: 1,964
Registered: 2001-6-30 17:22:56
Reaching into someone's wallet without permission is stealing.

 

-----signature-----
Yukishiro1  4 stars
Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
vn_nnanji posted:

Reaching into someone's wallet without permission is stealing.



Yep. Unless maybe they just stole some money from you and then put it in their wallet.
Clackdor  1 star
Posts: 163
Registered: 2001-9-21 12:10:52
Paul plays both sides against the middle worse than anybody I know.

Confront him. Tell him you know how much he has in his wallet and ask for yours back.

 

-----signature-----
If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.
Cawlin  4 stars
Posts: 1,759
Registered: 2005-2-22 07:58:42
paulg_68 posted:

Cawlin posted:

Any other recourse you might take against them physically or by taking possession against his will of any of his other belongings or property is illegal.


I agreed from the start that it was illegal.

No need to beat that dead horse.





So you don't see the moral obligation to obey the law under this circumstance?

By disobeying the law you establish a VERY clear slippery slope for the kind of behavior which is the primary reason for the law in the first place.

 

-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters
paulg_68  4 stars
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
Cawlin posted:

So you don't see the moral obligation to obey the law under this circumstance?


There is no moral obligation to obey the law unless you granted the lawmakers the authority to make the laws.

 

-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1
Ptilk  4 stars
Title: Creepy old pirate
Posts: 2,359
Registered: 2002-2-13 14:52:58
I wouldn't have lent him the 50 in the first place.

I would have given it to him.

If he somehow managed to owe me 50 bucks, I wouldn't ever expect it back, care if I got it back, or thought about it again.

I would have also punched the asshole that was going thru his wallet.
Cawlin  4 stars
Posts: 1,759
Registered: 2005-2-22 07:58:42
paulg_68 posted:

Cawlin posted:

So you don't see the moral obligation to obey the law under this circumstance?


There is no moral obligation to obey the law unless you granted the lawmakers the authority to make the laws.





That's called a social contract and it is bespoke, or assumed.


When you get down to it, law is only a subjective discrimination based on what a (presumably) majority of people agree is "right".

Granted in some cases it gets very grey and fuzzy, but this is not such a case and to be honest, it's a little simplistic to argue that because SOME laws are grey, all are - this is not an "in for a penny, in for a pound" argument.

 

-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters
paulg_68  4 stars
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
Cawlin posted:

paulg_68 posted:

Cawlin posted:

So you don't see the moral obligation to obey the law under this circumstance?


There is no moral obligation to obey the law unless you granted the lawmakers the authority to make the laws.





That's called a social contract and it is bespoke, or assumed.


I just made a law that you owe me $100. I'll PM you my paypal info.


Cawlin posted:

When you get down to it, law is only a subjective discrimination based on what a (presumably) majority of people agree is "right".

Granted in some cases it gets very grey and fuzzy, but this is not such a case and to be honest, it's a little simplistic to argue that because SOME laws are grey, all are - this is not an "in for a penny, in for a pound" argument.


The guy has $50 that is yours and you take it. That doesn't even qualify as fuzzy?

 

-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.