http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/28/10909475-witness-mom-says-police-told-her-trayvon-martin-shooting-wasnt-self-defense


Awkward!

There's your witness. Oops!

 

-----signature-----

Thank you my bitch

 

-----signature-----

Awkward for you, perhaps... Your link disputes your argument

"Once they did, Brown alleged, police tried to lead her son to agree to certain assertions, such as the race of the person on the ground and what he was wearing. But the boy stuck to his insistence that he couldn't make out either because it was too dark.

Brown alleged that the lead investigator "told me this was not self-defense," saying she should "read between the lines" because "this was racial stereotyping."

Martin was black; Zimmerman is Hispanic.

She said the investigator said he had children of his own "and seemed angered by it," saying, "I need to prove this was not self-defense."

 

-----signature-----

"But the boy stuck to his insistence that he couldn't make out either because it was too dark."

Talking to the mother of a child who saw nothing with Al Sharpton involved

Try reading your own stories before posting them.

 

-----signature-----

You both need to read it again. This time pay attention to all the words.

Her son, your star witness, says it was not self defense.

Sorry to bring reality in to burst your bubble!

 

-----signature-----

Yes you need to re-read that again.......

Her son who saw nothing.

This is not the adult witness who saw the fight.

 

-----signature-----

Tell me Grym, is English you're first language?



"When asked if her son thought it was self defense she said, " absolutely not."

What part of that is difficult for you?

 

-----signature-----

Why didn't he answer?

How old is this witness?

It sounds to me like the son was saying one thing, and the mother is trying to say he really means something else.

Link?

 

-----signature-----

This is John. The 13 year old boy that they (OP goons) are hanging their entire hat on.

 

-----signature-----