Groucho48 posted:
Which story of Zimmerman's do they have to contradict? The first story that he told police...that he had gotten out of his truck to check the street signs and Martin jumped him? Or, the story he is now going with...that he had followed Martin for a while, given up, and was walking back to his truck when Martin jumped him?
The guy was lying to police in at least one of those stories. Which means he has no credibility at all.
Bowlartz posted:
There won't be a trial. They don't have any evidence contradicting Zimmerman. They tried and are still trying to "find" witnesses that will tell them what they want to hear.
There won't be a trial. They don't have any evidence contradicting Zimmerman. They tried and are still trying to "find" witnesses that will tell them what they want to hear.
Which story of Zimmerman's do they have to contradict? The first story that he told police...that he had gotten out of his truck to check the street signs and Martin jumped him? Or, the story he is now going with...that he had followed Martin for a while, given up, and was walking back to his truck when Martin jumped him?
The guy was lying to police in at least one of those stories. Which means he has no credibility at all.
Disproving his story isn't what the legal system requires.
You have to prove yours, and I just don't see it happening.



ou will add your "eyes and ears" to those of the Police Department which cannot be everywhere, all the time, by keeping a watchful eye and open ear to what is happening in your neighborhood. You will extend their ability to provide security by reporting anything unusual or suspicious, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, so they can follow up on your leads. What you will not do is get physically involved with any activity you report or apprehension of any suspicious persons. This is the job of the law enforcement agency.