GrymmDAOC posted:
So basically you are claiming that the the war in Japan would have been less costly than the Italian campaign? Bull. It took *2* Nuclear weapons for Japan to decide to call it quits. The battle of Berlin cost over a million casualties, And I cannot believe the Japanese would fight for their homeland any less tenaciously than the Germans.
The Japanese campaign would have been a brutal bloodbath.
Yukishiro1 posted:
Incidentally, almost certainly more Americans died in Korea than would have died in a nuclear-free end to WWII.
Incidentally, almost certainly more Americans died in Korea than would have died in a nuclear-free end to WWII.
So basically you are claiming that the the war in Japan would have been less costly than the Italian campaign? Bull. It took *2* Nuclear weapons for Japan to decide to call it quits. The battle of Berlin cost over a million casualties, And I cannot believe the Japanese would fight for their homeland any less tenaciously than the Germans.
The Japanese campaign would have been a brutal bloodbath.
We covered that few times already in previous posts, and thats not the point of discussion here
-----signature-----



RzZuVqyAQI
