VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: What happened to all these inside bacon jokes? [Locked]
BigBor  1 star
Posts: 150
Registered: 2010-12-10 08:37:46
Hazel-wudi posted:

Bacon is good on some things, but I really don't get the obsession some people have with it.



Bacon Makes Everything Better...EVERYTHING!

















 

-----signature-----
Borwych / Borwyson / Kuku 1999
"None of us want to see your rectal facility basically destroyed" - Bhutt
"Just look for me spamming in /ct for stuff that doesn't exist." - Rhesus
"i want more booby type looking armor!!!" - Tika
"Wrong hole." - Rhesus
Bhutthed  1 star
Title: His Bhuttness
Posts: 161
Registered: 2004-8-9 06:49:23
^ WIN

 

-----signature-----
pwned irl by Lilly Lamage
SBT: the Short Bus Tribe
Bhutthed, Twelvepack, Bhutta - re-retired
Calin Moritan tells you, "xif" <3
God Bless our troops and their families
zuizide  1 star
Title: FF's Hyssop Vendor
Posts: 111
Registered: 2000-10-12 08:39:50
Be careful posting that bacon bikini pic. That's the one Tika warned me about saying it was inappropriate even though there is no nudity... *shrug*

 

-----signature-----
Zuizide ~ Exhibitionist ~ The Hood Store
Sid Deuce ~ Chumlee ~ Wykid Mystik
BigBor  1 star
Posts: 150
Registered: 2010-12-10 08:37:46
zuizide posted:

Be careful posting that bacon bikini pic. That's the one Tika warned me about saying it was inappropriate even though there is no nudity... *shrug*



Well considering what gets posted on the DT boards, it definitely isn't a problem for IGN. If local mods want to apply thier own standard vs. the company standard then obviously I can't stop them, but I will file that under "not my problem". I haven't seen a different TOS for DT vs. the rest of the vault so I am not sure why there should be that level of inconsistency in forum moderation.


Actual TOS relevant portion:


Babe Threads are only allowed on Community Forums and on Server Forums where Moderators agree to allow them. If we can see nipples, pubic hair or "private parts" the image will be nuked.


I don't see any "nukable" reasons to have a problem with it. And I would hardly classify a single comedy picture as a "babe thread". That would seem an excessive interpretation. No one modded the "man junk" ads that were appearing on the board and those were more revealing that the bacon bikini. I am still having nightmares. *Shrug* as well.

 

-----signature-----
Borwych / Borwyson / Kuku 1999
"None of us want to see your rectal facility basically destroyed" - Bhutt
"Just look for me spamming in /ct for stuff that doesn't exist." - Rhesus
"i want more booby type looking armor!!!" - Tika
"Wrong hole." - Rhesus
zuizide  1 star
Title: FF's Hyssop Vendor
Posts: 111
Registered: 2000-10-12 08:39:50
BigBor posted:

zuizide posted:

Be careful posting that bacon bikini pic. That's the one Tika warned me about saying it was inappropriate even though there is no nudity... *shrug*



Well considering what gets posted on the DT boards, it definitely isn't a problem for IGN. If local mods want to apply thier own standard vs. the company standard then obviously I can't stop them, but I will file that under "not my problem". I haven't seen a different TOS for DT vs. the rest of the vault so I am not sure why there should be that level of inconsistency in forum moderation.

Actual TOS relevant portion:

Babe Threads are only allowed on Community Forums and on Server Forums where Moderators agree to allow them. If we can see nipples, pubic hair or "private parts" the image will be nuked.

I don't see any "nukable" reasons to have a problem with it. And I would hardly classify a single comedy picture as a "babe thread". That would seem an excessive interpretation. No one modded the "man junk" ads that were appearing on the board and those were more revealing that the bacon bikini. I am still having nightmares. *Shrug* as well.


Agreed to all of it. Was just giving you a heads up. Our mods here are often overzealous and pick and choose who they apply what rules to. Just be aware is all I'm saying.

 

-----signature-----
Zuizide ~ Exhibitionist ~ The Hood Store
Sid Deuce ~ Chumlee ~ Wykid Mystik
BigBor  1 star
Posts: 150
Registered: 2010-12-10 08:37:46
zuizide posted:

Agreed to all of it. Was just giving you a heads up. Our mods here are often overzealous and pick and choose who they apply what rules to. Just be aware is all I'm saying.



Yeah, its all good. I am not trying to pick a mod fight, was just pointing out my thought process. Anyway, it wouldn't be the first time I felt the whack of the mod hammer.


I was probably just born this way.


 

-----signature-----
Borwych / Borwyson / Kuku 1999
"None of us want to see your rectal facility basically destroyed" - Bhutt
"Just look for me spamming in /ct for stuff that doesn't exist." - Rhesus
"i want more booby type looking armor!!!" - Tika
"Wrong hole." - Rhesus
Hazel-wudi  4 stars
Posts: 2,254
Registered: 2003-8-4 09:48:57
The pictures of the men in the Calvin Klein ad were not originally placed on the boards by any of us, but by an advertiser. It would have been silly and nonsensical for the mods to remove that picture from our threads, when it was blazing out of the right hand corner every third time the board was refreshed.

 

-----signature-----
Elistra, 275th level Battle Og -- Frostfell
Naughty lil mage / Kachiko Kaiu / Everyone's Mule
Clan Takada.
4,662 posts in one week, 3-9-12 to 3-16-12.
Yes, that was 666 posts per day on average, and yes, that was intentional.
Bhutthed  1 star
Title: His Bhuttness
Posts: 161
Registered: 2004-8-9 06:49:23
REPORTED

 

-----signature-----
pwned irl by Lilly Lamage
SBT: the Short Bus Tribe
Bhutthed, Twelvepack, Bhutta - re-retired
Calin Moritan tells you, "xif" <3
God Bless our troops and their families
BigBor  1 star
Posts: 150
Registered: 2010-12-10 08:37:46
Hazel-wudi posted:

The pictures of the men in the Calvin Klein ad were not originally placed on the boards by any of us, but by an advertiser. It would have been silly and nonsensical for the mods to remove that picture from our threads, when it was blazing out of the right hand corner every third time the board was refreshed.



Yes, but that also makes the larger point that it would be more than hypocritical to force us to see those ads and then censor bacon bikini in a thread. Ohhh we are a family board and must save the children...unless Calvin Klein throws us a benjamin in which case...have a face full o' man junk, yo!

 

-----signature-----
Borwych / Borwyson / Kuku 1999
"None of us want to see your rectal facility basically destroyed" - Bhutt
"Just look for me spamming in /ct for stuff that doesn't exist." - Rhesus
"i want more booby type looking armor!!!" - Tika
"Wrong hole." - Rhesus
blinds_soul
Title: A Mang
Posts: 40
Registered: 2007-11-29 12:24:28
BigBor posted:




This is just wrong


BigBor posted:




See above (not the womenz)

 

-----signature-----
Sausage Javelins - Monarch of RoG
Unofficial curator of the Dereth Museum
Owner of The Q', new and improved

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.