| Author |
Topic:
best picture ever? [Locked] |
Maxximus17 Title: High Warlord
Posts: 51
Registered: 2001-12-31 18:41:10
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
best pic ever ^
-----signature-----
Maxximus
70 Undead Priest
Rank 14 High Warlord of Bleeding Hollow
http://maxximus.dvdaf.com/owned?rc=1
|
notmforce2k Posts: 1,209
Registered: 2011-10-9 09:37:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
|
I smiled when I saw TUG's icon.
|
IMHO Title: Official Outpost Greeter
Posts: 2,287
Registered: 2001-11-1 03:55:02
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
-----signature-----
You're Right ~ Koneg
He's [Manegarm] like the Fred Phelps of atheism. ~Bubbledude
many of you are in the Republican boat, aka the ship of fools. ~Modeeb
We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different. ~Kurt Vonnegut
|
Caoilin Title: Instigator
Posts: 2,278
Registered: 2001-11-20 00:03:45
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
Element_X posted:
Personally I wish that govt would get out of the marriage business. Let gays marry, I don't care. While were at it, polygamy should be legal too. Nothing wrong with multiple consenting adults sharing marriage privileges.
i agree with this part.
-----signature-----
"Cao is really an asexual cricket from outer space" - Bernion
"I just wish you had man bits" - ShalisR
"i'll be your dirty ignorant redneck if you will be my drugged out cripple bitch" - shaggynuts24
"again, I'm stupid" - Brandun
|
notmforce2k Posts: 1,209
Registered: 2011-10-9 09:37:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
|
I respect that marriage WAS a religious practice, but as long as the Government wants to interfere with tax breaks, visitation rights, etc etc.. then they cannot discriminate against a group of people that by most accounts DO (whether people like TUG like to admit it or not) gain a trait by birth. The more we begin make the connection that it's not a choice for everyone, the more it is merely an act of discrimination which is illegal in the USA.
|
TheUnholyGhost Title: Mr. Subtle
Posts: 271
Registered: 2000-4-4 13:21:40
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
notmforce2k posted:
I respect that marriage WAS a religious practice, but as long as the Government wants to interfere with tax breaks, visitation rights, etc etc.. then they cannot discriminate against a group of people that by most accounts DO (whether people like TUG like to admit it or not) gain a trait by birth. The more we begin make the connection that it's not a choice for everyone, the more it is merely an act of discrimination which is illegal in the USA.
No gay gene has ever been found, after an exhaustive search trying to shove it down people's throats.
No child comes out of the womb being attracted to boys OR girls. Children aren't sexual at all, pervert.
I'm for gay rights. I don't care what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home.
You think because my opinion on homosexuality is different, I "hate" gays. The ignorance you're accusng me of is quite amusingly all yours.
If only we could detect stupidity in the womb. We might have been able to treat you with drugs.
-----signature-----
|
levgre Posts: 606
Registered: 2001-10-24 07:24:49
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
No gay gene has been found therefore one does not exist. Meanwhile all sorts of sexuality has been discovered to be determined partly/mostly by genetics. Let's just assume homosexuality isn't genetic, though.
And it's also true apparently, that if some people commit homosexuality by choice (like inmates, who perform a quite particular form of intercourse, and many would exclusively have sex with women if they were released), that means all homosexuality is a choice.
How can you argue against such internet A+++ reasoning?
And marriage never was a religious practice. It is a cultural tradition, and has been practiced in all sorts of cultures, including non-religious ones.
-----signature-----
<(o.O)> <(o.O<  (>o.O)> (>o.O<  <(''<  <( ' ' )> (>''  >
|
TheUnholyGhost Title: Mr. Subtle
Posts: 271
Registered: 2000-4-4 13:21:40
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
levgre posted:
No gay gene has been found therefore one does not exist. Meanwhile all sorts of sexuality has been discovered to be determined partly/mostly by genetics. Let's just assume homosexuality isn't genetic, though.
And it's also true apparently, that if some people commit homosexuality by choice (like inmates, who perform a quite particular form of intercourse, and many would likely exclusively have sex with women if they were released), that means all homosexuality is a choice.
How can you argue against such internet A+++ reasoning?
Congratulations on not reading anything I've posted.
I didn't say you had a choice in being gay. I said you had a choice in engaging in homosexual acts. Not SOME people have a choice, ALL people have a choice. How many black people can choose to be black?
As far as gay gene and genetics, your entire statement is a waffle. Partly/mostly? You might as well just say you're full of chit.
As I said before, no child comes out of the womb being attracted to boys OR girls.
All our behavior is affected in one way or another by genetics. And that's what homosexuality is...a behavior.
You don't like it...that's too bad. It's still the truth.
-----signature-----
|
notmforce2k Posts: 1,209
Registered: 2011-10-9 09:37:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
|
So your argument is that no gene has been found so it doesn't exist. In a of the exhaustive what, MAYBE coupld of decades searching?
So according to you there are no aliens, certainly no God, no black matter, and no evolution through history. All of these searches have been going on for much longer and yielded nothing so we should give up.
You really are brilliant. And by brilliant I mean ignorant, which is everything wrong with society. If it were up to you we wouldnt research anything that cannot be proven immediately. Your old, busted way of thinking has no place in modern society except to help single you out as a bigot. Don't venture too far outside of your cubicle, bigot. You might actually learn something.
Remember that magical day you decided to be attracted to women? You clearly made a choice to desire women and find certain traits attractive. Please, walk us through it.
|
levgre Posts: 606
Registered: 2001-10-24 07:24:49
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
best picture ever? |
TheUnholyGhost posted:
levgre posted:
No gay gene has been found therefore one does not exist. Meanwhile all sorts of sexuality has been discovered to be determined partly/mostly by genetics. Let's just assume homosexuality isn't genetic, though.
And it's also true apparently, that if some people commit homosexuality by choice (like inmates, who perform a quite particular form of intercourse, and many would likely exclusively have sex with women if they were released), that means all homosexuality is a choice.
How can you argue against such internet A+++ reasoning?
Congratulations on not reading anything I've posted.
I didn't say you had a choice in being gay. I said you had a choice in engaging in homosexual acts. Not SOME people have a choice, ALL people have a choice. How many black people can choose to be black?
As far as gay gene and genetics, your entire statement is a waffle. Partly/mostly? You might as well just say you're full of chit.
As I said before, no child comes out of the womb being attracted to boys OR girls.
All our behavior is affect in one way or another by genetics. And that's what homosexuality is...a behavior.
You don't like it...that's too bad. It's still the truth.
A person can also abstain from heterosexual sex their whole life. Your differentiation of "being homosexual" and "performing homosexual acts" is totally, 100% irrelevant to this debate. There is no worthwhile point to be drawn from your distinction here.
You don't think sexuality, in general, is strongly linked with genetics? I can't believe you're that clueless.
And it's absurd to state "children aren't sexual when they are born" as if you are actually making a point. Genetic code is carried out throughout a human's life, applying your same horrible grasp of genetics, one could never believe that male balding is genetic, as there is no onset until adulthood. One could not believe that genes instruct the human body to generate hormones at puberty.
Homosexuality/heterosexuality are not behaviors. They are traits. Sexual desires inspire the behavior.
It's astounding how hollow your arguments are.
-----signature-----
<(o.O)> <(o.O<  (>o.O)> (>o.O<  <(''<  <( ' ' )> (>''  >
|
|