VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Coke and Pepsi Carcinogenic? [Locked]
Hawkson  4 stars
Title: I AM AN ASSASSIN (SHH)
Posts: 1,791
Registered: 2001-10-23 22:57:09
YOUR HEAD A SPLODE.

 

-----signature-----
Hawkson, Esq.
Nothing is true, everything is permitted.
deadcactus  3 stars
Posts: 669
Registered: 2001-12-27 09:17:08
levgre posted:

Um Lung Cancer isn't a rare complication of smoking... smoking accounts for 87% of lung cancers in the US. And it is by far the deadliest form of cancer (meaning number of deaths, although survival rates aren't great).



The percentage of people with lung cancer who are smokers doesn't tell you anything about how many smokers get lung cancer. And your "by far the deadliest form of cancer" statement is just wrong.

Lifetime cancer risk in smokers is 17%, so yes it's a pretty safe bet that a smoker didn't die of cancer. And while we can argue the semantics of rare all day, I stand by my assertion that we are making a mistake in focusing on the big scary complications rather than the more insidious assaults on health and quality of life...

 

-----signature-----
'member dat?
True dat.
levgre  3 stars
Posts: 606
Registered: 2001-10-24 07:24:49
Well I got my statistics from the National Cancer Institute

Lung Cancer

Estimated New Cases(for a year): 226,160
Estimated Deaths: 160,340

Next closest death wise is Colon + Rectal, at 51,690.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers

It's true that people generally worry too much about cancer considering that other diseases kill more. That is probably because they see completely/exceptionally healthy people get cancer out of the blue, and sometimes die. I know I'm more scared of cancer than heart disease because I live healthy and my family doesn't have a history.

As far as healthcare services focusing on cancer, that makes sense because survival depends a lot more on early detection/treatment. For heart diseases and such it is more in the control of the patient. They can tell you at age 25 if you are setting yourself up for future heart/cardiovascular problems, but besides that, the healthcare system can't force them to live right.

 

-----signature-----
<(o.O)> <(o.O< (>o.O)> (>o.O<<(''< <( ' ' )> (>''>
Darwynnia  2 stars
Title: Sugar Kibbi
Posts: 311
Registered: 2003-10-13 07:40:13
Anebriated posted:

Darwynnia posted:

Meh, someone else spammed my facebook newsfeed with this story.

Caramel food coloring has between 0.02-0.002% 4-Methylimidazole, according to Toxnet's sources. So if a 330mL can contains 3 grams of caramel coloring (I have no idea how much a can has) then there's 0.66mg in it. They don't mention how much of it was found in Coke or Pepsi, but if there's 47 ug in the others, then the math would estimate each can has ~ 0.3 grams (since .66 mg = 660 ug) of caramel coloring.

The reported adverse effects from oral doses on animals are at 360 mg/kg of 4-Methylimidazole (convulsions, etc). So comparatively speaking, there's very little 4-Methylimidazole in a soda. Heck you'd have to drink thousands of cans per day to be at a dangerous level. Plus, the halflife estimate for 4-Methylimidazole is 1.8 hours, with the excretion route via urine.

I'm not worried.



you calculated risk of inducing a seizure, not risk of cancer. and since we don't know of the harmful agent is 4-MI itself or a metabolite, 4-MI's half-life isn't all that.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17619857
"Groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N rats were fed diets containing 0-, 625-, 1,250-, or 2,500 ppm 4MI (males) or 0-, 1,250-, 2,500-, or 5,000 ppm 4MI (females) for 106 weeks.Based on the food consumption the calculated average daily doses were approximately 30, 55, or 115 mg 4MI/kg body weight to males and 60, 120, or 250 mg 4MI/kg to females"
"The incidences of alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma in all exposed groups of females, alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma in 1,250 ppm males, and alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in 1,250 ppm males and 625- and 1,250 ppm females were significantly greater than those in the control groups"


sig. effects at 30mg-60mg/kg a day for 106weeks. i didn't look up their endpoints or redo your calculations because i am lazy. i wonder how many hundreds of other chemicals with a similar risk we expose ourselves to. lol i'm just playing devil's advocate. DC's right, lots of calories and no exercise is a truer culprit. everyday i see so many people on their way to a fat and slow death.



I used the seizure as the adverse effect level since that was what was reported on toxnet.

Still, for us to get close to 20 mg 4MI/KG a day in our diet we would need to drink thousands of cans of soda daily. We'd be dead from water intoxication long before we developed cancer, if each can has ~0.3 mg of caramel coloring.

 

-----signature-----
Cluttered Desks and Ideas...
Sisters Forever
Susan Lynne Hall
1/20/69-12/21/05
Rest in Peace

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.