VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Luck of the Draw Buff [Locked]
Ugh_Lancelot  3 stars
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 766
Registered: 2002-6-17 14:37:05
The_Korrigan posted:

And to make those scrubs happy, Blizzard gives them "artificial overgearing" in the form of a +15% buff.

Obviously, you're voicing the minority opinion. The majority of WoW players laugh at people like you and call you other names that are no less derogatory, yet probably much more solidly grounded in reality. Enjoy your circle-jerk. It's patently obvious which set of whiners has been more productive.

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
st0rmie  1 star
Posts: 108
Registered: 2005-4-20 00:33:25
Ugh_Lancelot posted:

Obviously, you're voicing the minority opinion. The majority of WoW players laugh at people like you and call you other names that are no less derogatory, yet probably much more solidly grounded in reality. Enjoy your circle-jerk. It's patently obvious which set of whiners has been more productive.


Hey, at least this time around people like Korrigan and myself and other serious players have convinced Blizzard that they don't need to actually ruin the game in the process of catering to over-entitled and under-talented players, but rather that they need to look for solutions which extend the sliding scale of difficulty (rather than condensing it all up at the "easy" end of the scale).

 

-----signature-----
Banquetto <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 85 Dwarf Priest / Daggerspine
Beliandra <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 80 Human Rogue / Daggerspine
Beliarchia <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 80 Draenei Shaman / Daggerspine
siujoey  2 stars
Posts: 280
Registered: 2001-12-26 09:10:44
st0rmie posted:

catering to over-entitled and under-talented players, but rather that they need to look for solutions which extend the sliding scale of difficulty (rather than condensing it all up at the "easy" end of the scale).



Bwahahahaha. Now I (somewhat) understand the stupidity. There are people that are under the impression that WoW is a "talent". Oh that's good stuff. Thank you.

 

-----signature-----
I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Diskent  1 star
Posts: 69
Registered: 2009-11-4 09:57:01
Zero_Washu posted:

Too late for the most part. Based on my guild and the few others I have in game friends with this is too late. Far too many people are gone so I will be curious what their numbers will be come late Feb and March. I mean, my guild which could see 40+ during prime time back in November and such can't even crack 20 now. Similar situations exist with the others I know of.



What does this have to do with you guild not being able to field a group? This is for PUGs isn't it?
NukeMage  2 stars
Posts: 346
Registered: 2002-4-7 16:58:45
siujoey posted:

st0rmie posted:

catering to over-entitled and under-talented players, but rather that they need to look for solutions which extend the sliding scale of difficulty (rather than condensing it all up at the "easy" end of the scale).



Bwahahahaha. Now I (somewhat) understand the stupidity. There are people that are under the impression that WoW is a "talent". Oh that's good stuff. Thank you.



WoW doesn't take talent, yet still so many people just suck at the game

 

-----signature-----
I need a new hobby . .
Ten level 85's (one of each class) in WoW
Back to try out the Feb patch in AC
The_Korrigan  3 stars
Title: Scrub Buster
Posts: 955
Registered: 2001-7-17 03:51:32
NukeMage posted:

WoW doesn't take talent, yet still so many people just suck at the game

Someone understood the point.

 

-----signature-----
SWTOR: 50 Jedi Shadow (Tank), 50 Sith Marauder (Annihilation).
LOTRO: Lifetime account, playing very casually.
WoW: Both accounts canceled for now.
GW2: Future Warrior.
Ugh_Lancelot  3 stars
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 766
Registered: 2002-6-17 14:37:05
NukeMage posted:

WoW doesn't take talent, yet still so many people just suck at the game


WoW takes talent the same way Super Mario Bros takes talent. My mother still sucks at Mario. She has multiple 85s in WoW. /shrug


st0rmie posted:

they need to look for solutions which extend the sliding scale of difficulty (rather than condensing it all up at the "easy" end of the scale).


There is already a sliding scale of difficulty called "gear." Would you say that Icecrown 5-man heroics (PoS/FoS/HoR) were completely retarded easy and, if so, would you say that having folks in gear 40+ iLevels higher than the content affected the apparent difficulty?

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
st0rmie  1 star
Posts: 108
Registered: 2005-4-20 00:33:25
siujoey posted:

Bwahahahaha. Now I (somewhat) understand the stupidity. There are people that are under the impression that WoW is a "talent". Oh that's good stuff. Thank you.


What's your explanation for persistent failures if not lack of talent? Is it a physical disability?

Ugh_Lancelot posted:

WoW takes talent the same way Super Mario Bros takes talent. My mother still sucks at Mario. She has multiple 85s in WoW. /shrug


Does she find Cataclysm heroics easy? How about Cataclysm raids? Hard-mode raids?

Ugh_Lancelot posted:

There is already a sliding scale of difficulty called "gear." Would you say that Icecrown 5-man heroics (PoS/FoS/HoR) were completely retarded easy and, if so, would you say that having folks in gear 40+ iLevels higher than the content affected the apparent difficulty?


I'm a little confused by this non sequitur. Point is, a lot of people found Cataclysm content too hard and wanted it made easier. In this buff, Blizzard took an approach that made it easier for the people who needed it (PUGs, most of which contain several bad players) without affecting the difficulty for people who didn't need it (organized groups of good players). Are you saying that they should have instead done nothing and waited until gear inflation made the problem go away? I wouldn't have minded that approach, but I know a vocal crowd would have.

 

-----signature-----
Banquetto <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 85 Dwarf Priest / Daggerspine
Beliandra <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 80 Human Rogue / Daggerspine
Beliarchia <Moonbrook Bowls Club> - 80 Draenei Shaman / Daggerspine
Broken_Kayfabe  1 star
Posts: 248
Registered: 2002-2-16 01:05:01
All mmorpgs give an opportunity to demonstrate better play. Only an idiot would think otherwise.

The difference with WoW is it rewards you either way. Special little snowflakes shouldn't have their egos bruised by there being "winners" and "losers". Everyone's a winner!



(even the guy who fell down at the starting line, started crying, and was taken off field for his mother to wipe his nose. Don't worry, siujoey, you're still a winner to us!)

 

-----signature-----
Thanks, but it's been fun
Five more minutes then I'm done!
I've been saying that to myself since
...yesterday.
- from "Has anybody seen my corpse". Man Everquest rocked back in the day...
siujoey  2 stars
Posts: 280
Registered: 2001-12-26 09:10:44
st0rmie posted:

siujoey posted:

Bwahahahaha. Now I (somewhat) understand the stupidity. There are people that are under the impression that WoW is a "talent". Oh that's good stuff. Thank you.


What's your explanation for persistent failures if not lack of talent? Is it a physical disability?



It's a lack of effort, plain and simple. Anyone can be "good" at WoW.

 

-----signature-----
I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.