Rosaria posted:
That's what I'm talkin' about! See, I knew if we typed thousands of words at each other sooner or later we could agree. Absolutely government benefits and protections could be structured around them. My question now is anyone in or near the government actually considering any of this. In other words, is this a possibility? I don't remember which country uses targetted VAT as a phase in but I will search around for that data.
That's what I'm talkin' about! See, I knew if we typed thousands of words at each other sooner or later we could agree. Absolutely government benefits and protections could be structured around them. My question now is anyone in or near the government actually considering any of this. In other words, is this a possibility? I don't remember which country uses targetted VAT as a phase in but I will search around for that data.
A VAT is about as close as UHC.
The Republicans would happily push a flat tax but they would do that to replace the income tax and not FICA or as a way to fund UHC.
-----signature-----
"Okay... I'm with you fellas" --Delmar
F is for Fake-believe
"We apologise for the inconvenience" --God
"What Jesus fails to appreciate is that it's the meek who are the problem"--Reg
Run, Forrest! Run!
F is for Fake-believe
"We apologise for the inconvenience" --God
"What Jesus fails to appreciate is that it's the meek who are the problem"--Reg
Run, Forrest! Run!