Yukishiro1 posted:
Which is why the hire the perky 22 year old sales rep and dress her in a skirt. And take the doctor out to dinner at a fancy resturaunt. And fly him down for a "conference" in Miami. Probably with the aforementioned sales rep. Because all that helps the doctor interpret the data better.
They hire a 22 year old sales rep with big tits and DSLs (dick suckin' lips) for two reasons:
1) because it's a lot cheaper to get a 22 year old freshout into the sales business than a 35 year old with 12 years of experience, and see how they do in it before they find out how fkn brutal it is and that if they aren't really good at it, they make siht for money... and
2) because if it comes down to prescribing company A's 3% drug or company B's 3% drug, yes, those companies want the Dr. to choose their drug, and all other things being equal, the Dr. may or may not choose a given company's drug, but again, there is oversight to ensure that physicians aren't inappropriately prescribing drugs.
Yukishiro1 posted:
I probably know more doctors than you do.
I very seriously doubt that.
Yukishiro1 posted:
You are kidding yourself if you think pharma marketing to doctors is benign and designed only with the best interests of doctors and patients in mind.
Dude, no marketing is benign, it's about competition. If a drug doesn't have an effect, it doesn't get approved. If it doesn't have as much of an effect or the risk/benefit ratio is not better than what the physician is currently using, they aren't going to suddenly put their patients on a new therapy that will be less effective and give them more side effects just because some sales rep bought them a fkn steak or a trip to Florida.
Yukishiro1 posted:
You keep mentioning law school which is funny because none of the crap pharma pulls with doctors would ever remotely fly in the legal context.
What they do is legal. There are laws around it, there is oversight. As for the "legal context", I want to know which legal context you're speaking about:
Are you talking about the legal context where you're subject to the whim of a judge unless you have the money to hire attorneys to file appeals against their capricious verdicts, or are you talking about the legal context wherein a wealthy party can indefinitely delay justice until their legal opponents run out of funding or time or both?
-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters