| Author |
Topic:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? [Locked] |
imaloon1  Posts: 674
Registered: 2003-9-15 07:19:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Sharia Law trumps the First Amendment?
-----signature-----
The time draws nearer to your fate
|
Yukishiro1  Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Stupid news outlet posted:
Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence, refusing to allow a grainy video of the incident to be entered in.
Then he said the guy was an idiot for provoking the other guy.
OH, THE HORROR! IT MUST BE SHARIA LAW FOR A JUDGE TO CALL SOMEONE A DOOFUS!
|
Cawlin Posts: 1,759
Registered: 2005-2-22 07:58:42
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
INB4 apologists... oh wait... not quite...
-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters
|
Yukishiro1 Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
The judge never said "sharia law" (whatever that is) trumps the 1st amendment. He just said the guy was a doofus for going out of his way to try to troll muslim people.  |
Tych2 Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Did he attack him or not?
-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks
|
Cawlin Posts: 1,759
Registered: 2005-2-22 07:58:42
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Yukishiro1 posted:
The judge never said "sharia law" (whatever that is) trumps the 1st amendment. He just said the guy was a doofus for going out of his way to try to troll muslim people.
The guy didn't go out of his way to troll muslims. He was in a halloween parade, in costume, right next to a guy dressed up as a zombie pope.
-----signature-----
If ignorance were painful, half the posters here would be on morphine drips.
Everyone playing WoW knows everything about playing two classes: 1) their own and 2) Hunters
|
DemonicXH Title: Camelot Vault Staff
News Editor
Posts: 584
Registered: 2003-12-1 08:14:17
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Yukishiro1 posted:
Stupid news outlet posted:
Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence, refusing to allow a grainy video of the incident to be entered in.
Then he said the guy was an idiot for provoking the other guy.
OH, THE HORROR! IT MUST BE SHARIA LAW FOR A JUDGE TO CALL SOMEONE A DOOFUS!
Read more:
But then he suggested to Perce that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion. Judge Martin stated that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not permit people to provoke other people. He also called Perce, the plaintiff in the case, a "doofus." In effect, Perce was the perpetrator of the alleged assault, in Judge Martin's view, and Elbayomy the innocent. The Sharia law that the Muslim attacker followed trumped the First Amendment.
|
vn_nnanji Title: Outpost Music Expert
Posts: 1,964
Registered: 2001-6-30 17:22:56
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
Doesn't seem right. If I beat you senseless because you take one of my french fries can I just say I'm Irish and thought you were making fun of potatoes?
They should both be put in a cell with Bradley Manning!
That or a threesome with Oprah.
-----signature-----
|
DemonicXH Title: Camelot Vault Staff
News Editor
Posts: 584
Registered: 2003-12-1 08:14:17
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
|
The courts have ruled multiple times that the First Amendment protects your freedom of speech and expression regardless of how hateful and provoking it is.
Look at all the rulings regarding the Westboro Baptist Church.
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? |
|
There should have been a trial.
If the evidence wasn't sufficient to prove there was an assault he would be found not guilty. I think there was at least a reasonable question as to whether or not an assault had occurred.
Also, I would be more concerned with making an armed and xenophobic culture feel as though they had no legal recourse in protecting themselves when expressing their views than with religious obligations of someone.
|
|
