Crackdoc posted:
How so restrict ? Providing each person of voting age a method of legal proof that they are entitled to vote isn't that difficult (as I and Afio already linked, those 2 and many jurisdictions provide avenues wherein voters can easilly 'prove' elegibility).
This wah wah wah about restriction is a Red Herring - anyone so stupid that they cannot meet some simple requirements to obtain proof shouldn't be allowed to walk and chew gum, never mind vote.

theredkay1 posted:
........................
You seem willing to restrict the voting ability of many Americans in order to keep illegals from voting.
Are you willing to give up your vote as the cost of keeping an illegal from voting?;............
........................
You seem willing to restrict the voting ability of many Americans in order to keep illegals from voting.
Are you willing to give up your vote as the cost of keeping an illegal from voting?;............
How so restrict ? Providing each person of voting age a method of legal proof that they are entitled to vote isn't that difficult (as I and Afio already linked, those 2 and many jurisdictions provide avenues wherein voters can easilly 'prove' elegibility).
This wah wah wah about restriction is a Red Herring - anyone so stupid that they cannot meet some simple requirements to obtain proof shouldn't be allowed to walk and chew gum, never mind vote.

So this wouldnt restrict anyones ability to vote...except for the group of people you deem to stupid to deserve a vote? You are presenting two statements which are at odds with each other.
There should still be a very high burden of proof to show actual benefits before you start restricting the voting ability of stupid people.



