Yukishiro1 posted:
I'm not sure the bullet angle would matter all that much. He could have easily thrown Martin off or shot him from the side or something like that too.
And even if it was from below, all that shows is they were in a fight. Not that Martin started it.
What really matters is the testimony they don't have, who started the fight.
I'm not sure the bullet angle would matter all that much. He could have easily thrown Martin off or shot him from the side or something like that too.
And even if it was from below, all that shows is they were in a fight. Not that Martin started it.
What really matters is the testimony they don't have, who started the fight.
Pretty much. Though, if Z's injuries turn out to be minimal, or, if it turns out M was shot from a distance, or, if forensic evidence catches Z in a lie about what happened, that might be enough to toss out the "self-defense" defense
-----signature-----
“Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it.†– Richard Feynman
!