VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Sometimes I want to ask God... [Locked]
kolbar  1 star
Posts: 56
Registered: 2002-7-4 11:53:05
http://esoriano.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/from-dust-to-man-a-scientific-proof/

 

-----signature-----
free Darktide
http://pictures.care2.com/view/2/869589471
[your icon here]<--------pwns all icons!
http://www.wimp.com/fatboy/
Executer on deathwing
Vodka_Tonic  1 star
Posts: 105
Registered: 2010-4-26 16:22:35
kolbar posted:

http://esoriano.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/from-dust-to-man-a-scientific-proof/



1st, this website is an insult to my intelligence.

2nd, I don't see what you were talking about anywhere on this page.

3rd, I'm just going to quote one of the replies some made on this blog.

Devon says:
August 8, 2011 at 6:45 am

It’s very unfortunate that so many on this site lack the basic knowledge/understanding of the scientific method…let alone Science in general. Mr. Soriano has tried to blur the lines between Chemistry and Biology enough to make a correlation between biblical text and scientific fact.

Please take the time to do some research (even just a little) on Abiogenesis and compare that with information regarding Evolution through Natural Selection. If you’re intellectually honest enough you will see HOW and WHY we share a similar chemical make-up with almost every other thing (living and nonliving) on this delicate planet.

I’m not posting this to insult anyone…just to inform everyone. So before any of you blindly attacks this post from a foxhole of fanaticism consider setting your vested emotions aside and seek out the “facts” not the subjective spewing of religious dogma.

 

-----signature-----
In game:
Vodka Tonic
Whisker Biskuit
CatholicPriest
Posts: 24
Registered: 2000-10-15 02:55:58
Some faggot has been watching way too much Full Metal Alchemist.

 

-----signature-----
I bet Simon has a mustache irl, so he can use it as a dick broom at the gay bar - SemiroundPiano
kolbar  1 star
Posts: 56
Registered: 2002-7-4 11:53:05
you are made of dirt and water sorry scientific fact ....i too can copy and paste lol


I’ve studied abiogenesis. It is required in a closed system and requires faith to be accepted. Abiogenesis is not scientific, it is a poor substitute, at best, for any real explanation of how live began. DO NOT suppose yourself to have the answer, lest you mark yourself a fool.

Further, Darwin’s THEORY of natural selection certainly applies within a species. But the Cambrian layer of the fossil record – of which Darwin had no knowledge – gives strong evidence that forcing his theory upon all the species as a collective whole was wrong. Darwin was wrong.

On top of that, he had no apparatus for the studying the contents of the human cell. He had no idea of the micro mechanics of cell maintenance and reproduction including the processes of DNA/RNA, amino acids, and proteins. If he had, he would likely have pointed to the possibility – as any good scientist would – of an intelligent designer – WITHOUT CALLING IT RELIGION.

Darwin admitted in his text that, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”

And stating that all biology is related because we share common composition is on the level of saying that because all books are ink on paper they are written by the same author.

Science tries too hard to sell its theories as fact, even when the theory is out-weighed by scientific law. The big bang theory, for instance, go directly against the first and second laws of thermodynamics. WHY??? It’s because the atheistic faction of the scientific community is too proud of its own work to consider the existence of ID.

But my biggest complaint stems from the simple fact that science has no apparatus nor methodology for studying the supernatural – including the existence of heaven, hell, God, and our very souls – yet takes the most arrogant position of declaring none of it exists. Shame on you. Stop it. You’re creating confusion.

Your best response is to say, “we have no comment”, and move back into the business of the material world.

 

-----signature-----
free Darktide
http://pictures.care2.com/view/2/869589471
[your icon here]<--------pwns all icons!
http://www.wimp.com/fatboy/
Executer on deathwing
Vodka_Tonic  1 star
Posts: 105
Registered: 2010-4-26 16:22:35
kolbar posted:

you are made of dirt and water sorry scientific fact ....i too can copy and paste lol


I’ve studied abiogenesis. It is required in a closed system and requires faith to be accepted. Abiogenesis is not scientific, it is a poor substitute, at best, for any real explanation of how live began. DO NOT suppose yourself to have the answer, lest you mark yourself a fool.

Further, Darwin’s THEORY of natural selection certainly applies within a species. But the Cambrian layer of the fossil record – of which Darwin had no knowledge – gives strong evidence that forcing his theory upon all the species as a collective whole was wrong. Darwin was wrong.

On top of that, he had no apparatus for the studying the contents of the human cell. He had no idea of the micro mechanics of cell maintenance and reproduction including the processes of DNA/RNA, amino acids, and proteins. If he had, he would likely have pointed to the possibility – as any good scientist would – of an intelligent designer – WITHOUT CALLING IT RELIGION.

Darwin admitted in his text that, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”

And stating that all biology is related because we share common composition is on the level of saying that because all books are ink on paper they are written by the same author.

Science tries too hard to sell its theories as fact, even when the theory is out-weighed by scientific law. The big bang theory, for instance, go directly against the first and second laws of thermodynamics. WHY??? It’s because the atheistic faction of the scientific community is too proud of its own work to consider the existence of ID.

But my biggest complaint stems from the simple fact that science has no apparatus nor methodology for studying the supernatural – including the existence of heaven, hell, God, and our very souls – yet takes the most arrogant position of declaring none of it exists. Shame on you. Stop it. You’re creating confusion.

Your best response is to say, “we have no comment”, and move back into the business of the material world.



People babbling about the existence of heaven, hell, god, and our very souls are the ones causing confusion.

Because of this I can not carry on with this conversation.

 

-----signature-----
In game:
Vodka Tonic
Whisker Biskuit
kolbar  1 star
Posts: 56
Registered: 2002-7-4 11:53:05
your beloved science has only explored about 30 percent of our planet ..our solar system is a tiny one at best on the outer edge of the milky way galaxy.if our galaxy were a grain of sand our planet would be the size of an atom.there are as many galaxies in the universe as there are grains of sand in all the beaches in all the world .your beloved science knows next to nothing...........................................

 

-----signature-----
free Darktide
http://pictures.care2.com/view/2/869589471
[your icon here]<--------pwns all icons!
http://www.wimp.com/fatboy/
Executer on deathwing

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.