>>
You poor deluded fools.
If you think that Animists are an improvement on the design of Theurgists, you need to quit your armchair Game Developing.
Animists are the least played class in the game for a lot of good reasons. They can be a frustrating class to play and require a patience and a learning curve to understand how to play them effectively.
And even then, they are still in a semi beta state with plenty of idiosyncratic bugs that may never be completely fixed.
Animists and theurgists share the same problems in many ways.
<<
Honestly, I don’t give a crap about how gimpy Animists are. If you don’t like them, make a thread about it posting ideas on how to fix them (like we are doing to Theurgists). I posted that the ideas given for Theurgists by Theurgists on this board (and probably others) were taken and made into a new class.
No where did I ever say that Animist are better than theurgists or an improved version of. The fact that the ideas given by the theurgist community were badly implemented and poorly designed is a totally different topic.
I totally agree that both classes have similar problems, they are both gimpy. Problem is that Theurgists have been waiting a whole year more than Animists for any REALISTIC fix.
So before calling people fools, please try to understand what the people mean. You may end up looking like the fool. (not a flame, just a warning

)
Unfortunatly, its not just a matter of how many bumps, posts or how many times people will say it. I seriously doubt that after almost 2 years, nothing substantial has been done to theurgists. It’s sad to see a class be in the shape it is in 2 years after launch and not see ANY word from Mythic on the subject.
Hunters used to be known as a bad, gimpy class. They got some major tweaking done to help them out. I cant comment if the class is better off, but I don’t see “Save the Hunters†posts like I did a year ago.
-----signature-----
ding dong