| Author |
Topic:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos [Locked] |
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
i'm sure they could have...i mean look at what they did...they lost to 11 teams but they definitely could easily do what 13 others could not do. 
then again, they LOST to the Patriots...and so did Miami so i dont know WTF DarkNem is smoking either.
The Pats let Rex Grossman put up 27 points again them. Your defense is atrocious, you'd be silly to think the Patriots have it in the bag.
i didn't say the had it in the bag, i didn't even address anything about what they WILL do...simply what they DID do, or more specifically what the Redskins did NOT do that you said they easily could have.
if the redskins COULD have easily beaten the Pats, why didn't they?
You're really arguing this? The game was headed to OT before Grossman threw a goal line INT (which was assisted by Moss). This was all without their starting LT and tight-end.
so taking a team to OT is easily beating them??
GOTCHA...they lost...end of story.
BTW, ALL teams have injuries, not just your tight end and LT.
Look, just because your a Patriots fan doesn't mean you have to be intentionally dense.
To answer your question about OT, yes. Did you not watch the game tonight? All it takes is the win of a coin-toss and a score and you've won.
The Skins have had their share of injuries, but they were missing their LT and TE because they got busted smoking some weed. Idiotic, yes, but they were still missing and a Rex Grossman led offense put up 27 points against them.
pps. Rex Grossman. Rex Grossman. Rex Grossman.
-----signature-----
this.
what the **** is a Barack?! - DMX
|
Cuttlery  Title: Wanna see what you missed?
Posts: 2,631
Registered: 2001-1-9 19:31:21
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
No, my money would be on the Pats. I am just not stupid enough to think there is no way the Broncos could win. If they do I won't be too surprised as Tim is throwing much better and teams now have a tough time trying to figure them out.
His last 3 games of the regular season beg to differ. He did make some good long throws today but even with that he completed less than 50% and missed on most of his actual route throws.
-----signature-----
0.o
Bored and Useless
|
Mangler_SC Title: Bellybutton Lint Collector
Posts: 1,856
Registered: 2003-12-2 08:37:05
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
Mangler_SC posted:
You can predict anything you want. Packers won't be stopped.
Now this I would bet against. I think the Who Dat boys have peaked at the right time.
Packers already beat the Saints this year.
-----signature-----
.
Mangler had an accident on the way home from the liquor store. He was run off the road and crashed into a woman's clinic. It was one giant Pabst smear.
-Bou_Te
.
Soylent CLiKK -- It's PEEEEEOPLEEE 
|
-Abysmal- Posts: 1,328
Registered: 2000-12-20 06:45:24
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Ex-remlocke posted:
Look, just because your a Patriots fan doesn't mean you have to be intentionally dense.
To answer your question about OT, yes. Did you not watch the game tonight? All it takes is the win of a coin-toss and a score and you've won.
The Skins have had their share of injuries, but they were missing their LT and TE because they got busted smoking some weed. Idiotic, yes, but they were still missing and Rex Grossman put up 27 points against them.
pps. Rex Grossman put up 27 points against them.
who the F is intentionally dense??
you said the skins could have easily beaten the pats, BUT THEY F'ING LOST to the Pats.
sorry, i had no idea you were playing a moronic *what if* game when you made that statement about a game that already had been decided.
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they had a QB...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they had their starting LT and TE...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they did not throw an INT...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they went to OT and IF they won the coin toss and IF they scored points off the flip...
who is intentionally dense?
-----signature-----
Now i LIVESTRONG
GO PATRIOTS
Yankees SUCK!
 I wish AC looked better, I miss it
 I love you forever Jamie
|
Tai-Daishar_MT  Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
I did not say they would win, just that it is possible. The Pats are a Jekyll and Hyde team with a swiss cheese secondary. The Broncos I watched today could pull it out if they play hard but again, if I am betting my money it goes on the Pats. Tebow had a hell of a day today despite throwing so few passes, I saw at least 2, maybe 3 passes dropped that were right on the money.
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
Look, just because your a Patriots fan doesn't mean you have to be intentionally dense.
To answer your question about OT, yes. Did you not watch the game tonight? All it takes is the win of a coin-toss and a score and you've won.
The Skins have had their share of injuries, but they were missing their LT and TE because they got busted smoking some weed. Idiotic, yes, but they were still missing and Rex Grossman put up 27 points against them.
pps. Rex Grossman put up 27 points against them.
who the F is intentionally dense??
you said the skins could have easily beaten the pats, BUT THEY F'ING LOST to the Pats.
sorry, i had no idea you were playing a moronic *what if* game when you made that statement about a game that already had been decided.
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they had a QB...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they had their starting LT and TE...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they did not throw an INT...
Skins could have beaten the Pats IF they went to OT and IF they won the coin toss and IF they scored points off the flip...
who is intentionally dense?
Now you are just making yourself look bad.
-----signature-----
this.
what the **** is a Barack?! - DMX
|
Tai-Daishar_MT Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Mangler_SC posted:
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
Mangler_SC posted:
You can predict anything you want. Packers won't be stopped.
Now this I would bet against. I think the Who Dat boys have peaked at the right time.
Packers already beat the Saints this year.
And? Welcome to playoff football.
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
Mangler_SC Title: Bellybutton Lint Collector
Posts: 1,856
Registered: 2003-12-2 08:37:05
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
And? Welcome to playoff football.
And if we have to play them again, we will defeat them again.
-----signature-----
.
Mangler had an accident on the way home from the liquor store. He was run off the road and crashed into a woman's clinic. It was one giant Pabst smear.
-Bou_Te
.
Soylent CLiKK -- It's PEEEEEOPLEEE
|
Kordirn Title: Pirate Prince
Posts: 1,513
Registered: 2004-4-19 01:15:26
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Mangler_SC posted:
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
And? Welcome to playoff football.
And if we have to play them again, we will defeat them again.
The packers aren't even going to play the saints anyways.
-----signature-----
ooOooo oOoOO OOo
|
vn_anon63xxx Title: Darwin's Revenge
Posts: 251
Registered: 2001-3-12 14:43:10
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
|
Rapistburger got Teb'owned
|
|
