| Author |
Topic:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos [Locked] |
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Mangler_SC posted:
Albdestroyer posted:
you should be afraid of the niners. Packers defense is weak. and the Niners have a D that can stop Rodgers.
Packers have been playing a pretty vanilla defense all year and a lot of that yardage given up has been during garbage time when the game was already well in hand.
As for stopping Rodgers? You can't stop him, you can only hope to contain him.
Then, they'll contain him. Probably better than KC did.
I'll call it now, if the Niner's and Packers meet. Packers lose.
|
-Abysmal-  Posts: 1,328
Registered: 2000-12-20 06:45:24
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
Chogram posted:
What sucks...
Is that Denver has absolutely no chance to beat New England next week.
The Patriots going for a Superbowl in Indianapolis might make me have to off myself.
The 5 - 11 Redskins could of easily beaten the Pats this year, I definitely wouldn't write Denver off.
i'm sure they could have...i mean look at what they did...they lost to 11 teams but they definitely could easily do what 13 others could not do. 
then again, they LOST to the Patriots...and so did Miami so i dont know WTF DarkNem is smoking either.
The Pats let Rex Grossman put up 27 points again them. Your defense is atrocious, you'd be silly to think the Patriots have it in the bag.
i didn't say the had it in the bag, i didn't even address anything about what they WILL do...simply what they DID do, or more specifically what the Redskins did NOT do that you said they easily could have.
if the redskins COULD have easily beaten the Pats, why didn't they?
-----signature-----
Now i LIVESTRONG
GO PATRIOTS
Yankees SUCK!
 I wish AC looked better, I miss it
 I love you forever Jamie
|
Sith_Mauler Posts: 1,851
Registered: 2002-12-21 13:40:03
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Albdestroyer posted:
Mangler_SC posted:
Albdestroyer posted:
you should be afraid of the niners. Packers defense is weak. and the Niners have a D that can stop Rodgers.
Packers have been playing a pretty vanilla defense all year and a lot of that yardage given up has been during garbage time when the game was already well in hand.
As for stopping Rodgers? You can't stop him, you can only hope to contain him.
Then, they'll contain him. Probably better than KC did.
I'll call it now, if the Niner's and Packers meet. Packers lose.
Especially with the hodge-podge line they have now.
Willis is going to feast.
-----signature-----
Well I ain't first class
But I ain't white trash
I'm wild and a little crazy too
I have seen a lot of things in my life time.
That is why I walk the line I walk.
|
Tai-Daishar_MT  Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Chogram posted:
What sucks...
Is that Denver has absolutely no chance to beat New England next week.
The Patriots going for a Superbowl in Indianapolis might make me have to off myself.
Lol, typical hater argle bargle here 
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
i'm sure they could have...i mean look at what they did...they lost to 11 teams but they definitely could easily do what 13 others could not do.
then again, they LOST to the Patriots...and so did Miami so i dont know WTF DarkNem is smoking either.
The Pats let Rex Grossman put up 27 points again them. Your defense is atrocious, you'd be silly to think the Patriots have it in the bag.
i didn't say the had it in the bag, i didn't even address anything about what they WILL do...simply what they DID do, or more specifically what the Redskins did NOT do that you said they easily could have.
if the redskins COULD have easily beaten the Pats, why didn't they?
You're really arguing this? The game was headed to OT before Grossman threw a goal line INT (which was assisted by Moss). This was all without their starting LT and tight-end.
ps. Grossman
-----signature-----
this.
what the **** is a Barack?! - DMX
|
Cuttlery Title: Wanna see what you missed?
Posts: 2,631
Registered: 2001-1-9 19:31:21
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
Chogram posted:
What sucks...
Is that Denver has absolutely no chance to beat New England next week.
The Patriots going for a Superbowl in Indianapolis might make me have to off myself.
Lol, typical hater argle bargle here
Does this mean you are willing to bet something deliciously embarrassing on the game?
-----signature-----
0.o
Bored and Useless
|
Mangler_SC Title: Bellybutton Lint Collector
Posts: 1,856
Registered: 2003-12-2 08:37:05
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
You can predict anything you want. Packers won't be stopped.
-----signature-----
.
Mangler had an accident on the way home from the liquor store. He was run off the road and crashed into a woman's clinic. It was one giant Pabst smear.
-Bou_Te
.
Soylent CLiKK -- It's PEEEEEOPLEEE  |
-Abysmal- Posts: 1,328
Registered: 2000-12-20 06:45:24
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
Ex-remlocke posted:
-Abysmal- posted:
i'm sure they could have...i mean look at what they did...they lost to 11 teams but they definitely could easily do what 13 others could not do.
then again, they LOST to the Patriots...and so did Miami so i dont know WTF DarkNem is smoking either.
The Pats let Rex Grossman put up 27 points again them. Your defense is atrocious, you'd be silly to think the Patriots have it in the bag.
i didn't say the had it in the bag, i didn't even address anything about what they WILL do...simply what they DID do, or more specifically what the Redskins did NOT do that you said they easily could have.
if the redskins COULD have easily beaten the Pats, why didn't they?
You're really arguing this? The game was headed to OT before Grossman threw a goal line INT (which was assisted by Moss). This was all without their starting LT and tight-end.
so taking a team to OT is easily beating them??
GOTCHA...they lost...end of story.
BTW, ALL teams have injuries, not just your tight end and LT.
-----signature-----
Now i LIVESTRONG
GO PATRIOTS
Yankees SUCK!
I wish AC looked better, I miss it
I love you forever Jamie
|
Tai-Daishar_MT Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Cuttlery posted:
Tai-Daishar_MT posted:
Chogram posted:
What sucks...
Is that Denver has absolutely no chance to beat New England next week.
The Patriots going for a Superbowl in Indianapolis might make me have to off myself.
Lol, typical hater argle bargle here
Does this mean you are willing to bet something deliciously embarrassing on the game?
No, my money would be on the Pats. I am just not stupid enough to think there is no way the Broncos could win. If they do I won't be too surprised as Tim is throwing much better and teams now have a tough time trying to figure them out.
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
Tai-Daishar_MT Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts: 469
Registered: 2000-3-9 15:14:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Denver Broncos |
Mangler_SC posted:
You can predict anything you want. Packers won't be stopped.
Now this I would bet against. I think the Who Dat boys have peaked at the right time.
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
|
