Dear Cutt,


Please read what I just posted earlier in this thread. Your obsession is clouding your reading ability.





Read what you posted here, it makes you look stupid:





What you posted is completely wrong, yet you keep harassing me about facts and not knowing anything.


I'm not afraid to say when I've made a mistake or I misinterpreted something. Why can't you do the same?

 

-----signature-----

Ron Paul says he's for smaller government,

And this is where you fail. Ron Paul says a lot and never done it. Obama says he is for smaller government and also never does. Romney says he is for smaller government and never does it, whats the difference?

Again, you are voting for fairy tales and dont actually know anything about Ron Paul in reality except. He didnt vote for the Patriot Act.

 

-----signature-----

The difference? Obama voted for and then later signed the Patriot Act. Romney openly supports the Patriot Act. Again, I apologize for caring about Civil Liberties, it's a real shortcoming of mine, I know.

 

-----signature-----

Thanks for the suggestion. I just did my own research and what I came up with was that Bush was a well liked and successful president, legendary in his support for democracy.

 

-----signature-----

Knock it, you two!

 

-----signature-----

Which all comes back to you care about the patriot act and that's all you know about Paul. Like I said if that's all you are basing your vote on that's fine. But don't bring up the smaller government, less deficit, his electability, or any of the crap you don't know anything about, it's making you look like you are a blind follower.

I actually applaud Paul on his no vote on the Patriot Act, unfortunately it brings up other issues such as why has he actually never done anything to further Civil Liberties. This brings into question his actual leadership and resolve. Paul says a lot but does little, his motivation for voting against the Patriot Act kind of makes me wonder if its for votes or because of the civil liberties thing, and if the latter why has he done nothing to amend it.

 

-----signature-----

Look, it's ACF. I'm not going to write up an essay on what I know about Paul. I've admitted where I was lacking in knowledge so I'm not sure what else you want. And his electability is still up for debate, as the the latest poll indicated. And yes I will continue to bring up smaller government, what the hell do you think a veto of the Patriot Act would be?


But enough about me Cutt, I'd really love to hear about who YOU support for President, as I'm sure there's plenty to talk about there.

 

-----signature-----

I dunno yet. I know who it will not be.

Obama, too liberal, I applaud some of his foreign policy decisions but he is way too deep for the entitlements.

Romney, basically Obama but white.

Paul, stands for nothing, too much flip floppery. No leadership skills.

Gingrich, he is just a mess.

Santorum, too jesus.

Not really sure, too much research to do and too much time left. Will probably be some 3rd party candidate.

 

-----signature-----

The only sane thing you've posted in this thread.

 

-----signature-----

Come on, Cutt. You're ignoring all the big figures in history that rose to leadership and then voluntarily disbanded it.

Like..... um...... like that one.... the.... wait.. no.....


Oh there's not? Hmm. Well surely he isn't just ANOTHER politician sitting in our giant, ineffective pool of them.

Oh he is? Hmm.