It's hard to choose who to sympathize with. On the one hand, a sexist homophobe; on the other hand, a misogynistic jingo.

I think ours were closer to the last 2 weeks of school. There might still have been a stink but for whatever reason I feel like it would be less.

 

-----signature-----

I'm trying to take it on a thready by thread basis, and on this one Sith comes out looking like the bigger piece of crap.

 

-----signature-----

I dont hate women as a whole. I hate women who use their sexuality to get things they want. Its a blatant type of manipulation and one of the many reasons that has put us in the current state that we are with children having children way too early in life, legal murdering of children, and the oversexualization of our youth as a whole. Its just a bad chain reaction of events that where if one generation had stood up and said "this isnt right" or "lets have alittle more decency in our lives" but they didnt and thats why we have girls wanting to put half naked pictures in a yearbook photo. We live in such a "must have it now" type of society that it forces children out of childhood way too early because they see their parents or other adults who get whatever they want the moment they want it so they think theyre entitled to that too.

Now dont get me wrong here cause men(mainly straight men) are to blame since they should have to exercise some self control too. Just because you want to see naked/half naked women every 10 seconds no matter where you are doesnt mean that you should. Like I said earlier, there is enough blame to go around. Straight men are usually the ones who create "sexy" advertising at targeted straight audiences.

The oversexualization and sexual manipulation of men by women are two reasons why society as a whole cant accept the gay culture or gay people as main stream. The main stream media is so overly hypersexualized towards the image of being straight. They in essence put blinders on people and tell them that "being straight is the norm, this is exactly what you should be like." Presenting gay sexual orientation in main stream media to a straight audience is like throwing a curve ball at a batter after throwing nothing but fast balls at them. I mean really think about it for a minute. When was the last time you've seen, in the main stream media, a gay male couple in bed doing a sex scene that wasnt rated R or NC-17 or something along those lines? Now think about how many movies/tv shows do the exact same thing and get a general PG rating. Your average straight romantic comedy movie will have at least two or three bedroom scenes where the main characters are having sex or just after sex. And who do you usually see getting out of bed (almost) completely naked? The women in probably 90%+ of them. Its really not surprising though especially in the US since people still have problem seeing a flaccid penis of a straight male on the screen much less two of them in a gay relationship.

This is why I and other people like myself get labeled as flamboyantly gay since we're not afraid to talk about our sexuality even though it differs from what is considered the "norm". I dont consider myself flamboyant at all. I dont try to interject my sexuality into conversations where sexuality isnt already being talked about or where someone else hasnt brought the subject of my sexuality up. I do however feel that I have a right to discuss my perception of sexuality as it pertains to me in a conversation about said subject or I have the right to start up a conversation about sexuality should I so choose just like every other straight person has the right to without being publicly ridiculed.

 

-----signature-----