| Author |
Topic:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. [Locked] |
Mangler_SC  Title: Bellybutton Lint Collector
Posts: 1,856
Registered: 2003-12-2 08:37:05
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
Banelord_FF posted:
Rhodoman posted:
NonOffensiveName posted:
the jury was hung(due to their gay bias)
Is this based on anything other than your own assumption?
Rho
Don't try talking sense to Non, it won't do any good.
-----signature-----
.
Mangler had an accident on the way home from the liquor store. He was run off the road and crashed into a woman's clinic. It was one giant Pabst smear.
-Bou_Te
.
Soylent CLiKK -- It's PEEEEEOPLEEE 
|
Anebriated  Title: I should be reading a book
Posts: 650
Registered: 2003-1-27 21:26:11
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
NonOffensiveName posted:
he could fully appreciate the consequences of his actions. I dont know what 14 year old couldnt appreciate the fact that shooting someone in the back of the head with a gun wont kill them unless they are literally mentally retarded. There was no mental defects or calls for a mental instability trial listed in the articles I read so he has all his faculties in place.
we aren't more lenient towards teenage kids because they can't appreciate the consequences of their actions-they can. that might be true before they're like four. The kid here knows exactly how bad he messed up. that's not the issue. the issue is that your frontal cortex doesn't fully develop until you are 25. that's the part of the brain that regulates their behavior- it gets you to do the more difficult thing if it's good for you. we can all appreciate how that effects their behavior- hey lets go drink.
similarly a five year old will hit a kid knowing full well that he will receive the standard punishment like a time-out but he did it anyways. he couldn't control himself. that's why five year olds aren't incarcerated for assault when they punch a kid., not because they can't appreciate the consequences. they can appreciate the consequences.
so that's my case for not executing children. the supreme court agrees with me i think. non can cry till cows come home.
|
NonOffensiveName Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts: 830
Registered: 2001-10-7 19:39:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
Rhodoman posted:
NonOffensiveName posted:
the jury was hung(due to their gay bias)
Is this based on anything other than your own assumption? Rho
Its the obvious result, otherwise they would've convicted him because he committed premeditated murder. Basically any jury who wasnt bias would've convicted him in other words whether he was straight gay bi or whatever. Sexual harassment isnt grounds for justifiable murder. When theyre only two choices and they dont choose the right one, there has to be some kind of bias going on. Its the process of very simple elimination.
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW?
A: A whore that likes attention
|
-Abysmal- Posts: 1,328
Registered: 2000-12-20 06:45:24
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
NonOffensiveName posted:
Its the process of very simple elimination.
no, that's not how the trial went, that's how the problem was fixed!
2 rounds, problem solved...now THAT is a simple elimination!
-----signature-----
Now i LIVESTRONG
GO PATRIOTS
Yankees SUCK!
 I wish AC looked better, I miss it
 I love you forever Jamie
|
Rhodoman Posts: 1,397
Registered: 2001-6-14 21:02:19
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
NonOffensiveName posted:
Rhodoman posted:
NonOffensiveName posted:
the jury was hung(due to their gay bias)
Is this based on anything other than your own assumption? Rho
Its the obvious result, otherwise they would've convicted him because he committed premeditated murder. Basically any jury who wasnt bias would've convicted him in other words whether he was straight gay bi or whatever. Sexual harassment isnt grounds for justifiable murder. When theyre only two choices and they dont choose the right one, there has to be some kind of bias going on. Its the process of very simple elimination.
So, No.
Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece
Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur
Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Kanga_Roo  Posts: 439
Registered: 2002-2-26 12:58:17
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
Personally I think murderers and child molesters should go in for life in 95% or more of cases.
With that said 21 years for a juvie is not inconsistent with what I see as normal sentencing in this sort of case. I'm not seeing a different standard here.
-----signature-----
Laws control the lesser man... Right conduct controls the greater one.
Mark Twain
|
NonOffensiveName Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts: 830
Registered: 2001-10-7 19:39:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:02am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
-Abysmal- posted:
NonOffensiveName posted:
Its the process of very simple elimination.
no, that's not how the trial went, that's how the problem was fixed! 2 rounds, problem solved...now THAT is a simple elimination!
Now we just need simple flip of a switch to solve the other problem and all would be right with the world. But that'll never happen since the bias people on the jury protected him.
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW?
A: A whore that likes attention
|
Anebriated Title: I should be reading a book
Posts: 650
Registered: 2003-1-27 21:26:11
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
i would commute all death sentences to life in prison  knowledge and reason would prevail. |
levgre Posts: 606
Registered: 2001-10-24 07:24:49
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
Kanga_Roo posted:
Personally I think murderers and child molesters should go in for life in 95% or more of cases.
With that said 21 years for a juvie is not inconsistent with what I see as normal sentencing in this sort of case. I'm not seeing a different standard here.
The point of the legal system is not in just giving people what they "deserve". Eye for an eye justice is generally pretty fair, but retribution is not the only goal.
It's understandable to give leniency to criminals who can change their ways. Youths are prime examples of this of this.
20 years behind prison walls will seem like a lifetime for a prisoner, especially someone who has only lived for 13-20 years. Now will giving them a sentence beyond this benefit society in some way? I think there is generally diminishing returns.
-----signature-----
<(o.O)> <(o.O<  (>o.O)> (>o.O< <(''< <( ' ' )> (>'' >
|
Anebriated Title: I should be reading a book
Posts: 650
Registered: 2003-1-27 21:26:11
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:03am
Subject:
Wow even in 2012, you can shoot a gay kid in cold blood and get off almost scot-free for it. |
|
i don't think that will get through to him levgre, but nice try. see, you are appealing to reason. you have some silly assumption that laws should have a positive effect on society and not just feel good. that doesn't feel right at all, man.
to demonstrate my point i am going to raise a puppy, and when he sticks his head in the trash to get food i will kick him because he knew it was bad and that's what is important. like non said, it's simple.
|
|
