Arc_DT posted:
Jezza_Belle posted:
um, did you actually read the article, it states that there hasn't been a case of AIDS linked to porn since 2004, and they self police.
Did you? Ged Kenslea explicitly disagrees with you, the state law for this was already in place, and LOL at the fine parsing of the statement of the industry on "no directly-linked cases of AIDS."
My point with BT is that regulations have reasons, and in this case it was a pretty good one. He can't even jerk off over his constitution on this one, because it was a case of local enforcement of a state law. There was a compelling reason for the law to exist and a mandate on the local municipality to enforce it.
As long as he wears a condom...
If you're flammable and have legs, you're never blocking a fire exit.