VaultNetwork.net Vault Network Boards
Author Topic: The NEEDNT, or non-essential, energy dense, nutritionally deficient, list. [Locked]
Ah-Schoo  4 stars
Title: Fuzzy Caterpillar of Friendliness
Posts: 3,034
Registered: 2000-8-11 09:05:29
Malrothien posted:

What pissed me off about that list is honey. HONEY?!

No matter, the bees are dying anyway.

 

-----signature-----
.
Opinion = fact. Anecdote = proof. Political label more important than either of those.
Welcome to ACF, where debate goes to die.
.
"fascist totalitarian secular progressive Zionist intellectually challenged Christian puppets." - Aerlinthina
Gaevren  4 stars
Title: Wat do?
Posts: 1,181
Registered: 2004-9-15 09:29:36
Sure, honey. Let's see:

Non-essential: check. You don't NEED honey to function properly. You can get what honey provides from other sources- like fruit.
Energy dense: check
Nutritionally deficient: check. It's pretty much just sugar.

The whole point of the list/article is to educate people who are fooled into thinking these foods are healthier than the 'bad' foods they've been eating. I swear I know people who think they are eating better and being "healthier" and will lose weight by substituting honey for table sugar- and the amount of honey they eat is appalling. WTF really?

I think honey is better than sugar just because it's been less processed and because there are some possible benefits to local honey (may be able to help reduce allergies, things like that) but when it comes to providing essential nutritional benefits like vitamins/minerals/proteins/etc, yeah it's totally nutritionally deficient. Your body can turn a LOT of things into glucose for energy, it doesn't need honey.

 

-----signature-----
There are no automatic doors, just very polite ninjas
silvadel2  2 stars
Posts: 378
Registered: 2009-7-13 09:37:29
Gaevren posted:

Sure, honey. Let's see:

Non-essential: check. You don't NEED honey to function properly. You can get what honey provides from other sources- like fruit.
Energy dense: check
Nutritionally deficient: check. It's pretty much just sugar.

The whole point of the list/article is to educate people who are fooled into thinking these foods are healthier than the 'bad' foods they've been eating. I swear I know people who think they are eating better and being "healthier" and will lose weight by substituting honey for table sugar- and the amount of honey they eat is appalling. WTF really?

I think honey is better than sugar just because it's been less processed and because there are some possible benefits to local honey (may be able to help reduce allergies, things like that) but when it comes to providing essential nutritional benefits like vitamins/minerals/proteins/etc, yeah it's totally nutritionally deficient. Your body can turn a LOT of things into glucose for energy, it doesn't need honey.



Actually there are quite a lot of trace things in foods such that it is very good to have a wide variety of things -- including things like honey.

If we restrict diets (especially of children) by eliminating whole categories that we think are obesity makers then we will one day find that they are immunodeficient or have other problems because they had a more narrow food focus.

It isnt a problem that people eat things -- it is a problem that people are eating too much of the same things... IE chocolate is good for you. A whole chocolate cake is not good for you. A 3 ounce cup of peanuts is good for you. A can of peanuts is not good for you. We will probably find out that raw milk like they are trying to outlaw entirely is good for you in small quantities especially as a child.

 

-----signature-----
Lost postcount 17k; Lost years 9.6; Lost Title: Priceless
The most expensive things in life are free
Asheron's Call 3 // Horizons 2 -- Dragons of Dereth (one can always hope)
1920x1200 is a Monitor. 1920x1080 is a TV without a tuner.
deadcactus  3 stars
Posts: 669
Registered: 2001-12-27 09:17:08
Alcohol is number 1 while soda is 41? BS.

 

-----signature-----
'member dat?
True dat.
Wulfgarr
Posts: 42
Registered: 2002-3-24 21:23:13
Bagel isn't on that?

 

-----signature-----
Every time I read Jane Austen, I want to dig her up and beat her over the head with her shin bone.
-Mark Twain
Lothland  1 star
Posts: 194
Registered: 2004-3-8 02:11:56
deadcactus posted:

Alcohol is number 1 while soda is 41? BS.

 

-----signature-----
Everyone who has put me in their sig has had it forceably removed. -Xalaten
myxomatosis8  3 stars
Title: amateur zookeeper
Posts: 800
Registered: 2001-7-14 23:45:21
deadcactus posted:

Alcohol is number 1 while soda is 41? BS.



I take it you entirely missed the fact that the list is alphabetically ordered?

 

-----signature-----
If you're flammable and have legs, you're never blocking a fire exit.
winga  4 stars
Title: Canadian
Posts: 2,256
Registered: 2001-4-27 15:46:32
myxomatosis8 posted:

deadcactus posted:

Alcohol is number 1 while soda is 41? BS.



I take it you entirely missed the fact that the list is alphabetically ordered?


Heh
Gaevren  4 stars
Title: Wat do?
Posts: 1,181
Registered: 2004-9-15 09:29:36
silvadel2 posted:

Gaevren posted:

Sure, honey. Let's see:

Non-essential: check. You don't NEED honey to function properly. You can get what honey provides from other sources- like fruit.
Energy dense: check
Nutritionally deficient: check. It's pretty much just sugar.

The whole point of the list/article is to educate people who are fooled into thinking these foods are healthier than the 'bad' foods they've been eating. I swear I know people who think they are eating better and being "healthier" and will lose weight by substituting honey for table sugar- and the amount of honey they eat is appalling. WTF really?

I think honey is better than sugar just because it's been less processed and because there are some possible benefits to local honey (may be able to help reduce allergies, things like that) but when it comes to providing essential nutritional benefits like vitamins/minerals/proteins/etc, yeah it's totally nutritionally deficient. Your body can turn a LOT of things into glucose for energy, it doesn't need honey.



Actually there are quite a lot of trace things in foods such that it is very good to have a wide variety of things -- including things like honey.

If we restrict diets (especially of children) by eliminating whole categories that we think are obesity makers then we will one day find that they are immunodeficient or have other problems because they had a more narrow food focus.

It isnt a problem that people eat things -- it is a problem that people are eating too much of the same things... IE chocolate is good for you. A whole chocolate cake is not good for you. A 3 ounce cup of peanuts is good for you. A can of peanuts is not good for you. We will probably find out that raw milk like they are trying to outlaw entirely is good for you in small quantities especially as a child.



I agree with you- I don't think that cutting honey, chocolate, or whole milk (for instance) entirely from one's diet is the way to go...but people freaking need to learn how to moderate. It should be noted though, that all cultures have traditionally eaten different foods in order to supply them with both the macro and micro nutrients needed to survive. Viewed in that light, one could argue that milk and honey aren't essential parts of anyone's diet.

 

-----signature-----
There are no automatic doors, just very polite ninjas
Lanacan  3 stars
Title: Random, Crazy, Mental....
Posts: 789
Registered: 2002-2-19 17:27:59
winga posted:

myxomatosis8 posted:

deadcactus posted:

Alcohol is number 1 while soda is 41? BS.



I take it you entirely missed the fact that the list is alphabetically ordered?


Heh



LOL

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.