Brother_Tempus posted:
Hyperimiator posted:
Why?
Well because this

will never occur from Iran .. Hyper wants to deal with what-ifs because reality shoots his argument to shreds
Reality > What ifs
Since we're on the subject of "what ifs" and you're a military man BT... whats the current strategy if Israel gets nuked by Iran... or even just straight out attacked conventionally? They do have ballistic 2 stage surface to surface missiles.
I mean back in 2008 Hillary went on file as saying she'd attack Iran if Iran attacked Israel. You think that's any different?
You say Reality but all you have are the same facts that are in front of us
in 2008 the IAEA confronted Iran about the discovered plans to reconfigure a Shahab-3 to house a nuclear device... project 111. Iran claimed the evidence was fabricated... but they sure as hell haven't fabricated a few things though
1. The Iranian President has made several public comments involving wiping Israel off the map
2. They are even as recently as mid February still refusing IAEA inspections
3. The Shahab-3 has a range of between 2000 and 2500 Kilometers which means it can easly strike anywhere in Israel
4. Iran's ballistic capabilities have been tremendously enhanced by the technical assistance of both China and Russia so I'm sure their targeting systems are a hellova lot better than any sorry-ass SCUD.
And those are just the reasons with the idea that they would start something with Israel... forget the idea that they could hand radioactive material to a pack of extremists like Hamas to load onto a rocket and shoot willy-nilly at their enemies and sit back laughing at the results.
Simply put, IMO Iran doesn't demonstrate a high enough regard for life to warrant allowing them such a thing. They aren't ready yet.
-----signature-----
The Oatmeal Butterscotch paired with a Snickerdoodle
turned my cynical penis into a happy vagina
Then after an Oatmeal Cranberry and Double Chocolate,
it made my new vagina spontaneously sing the Trolololo Song in an elevator.
---AkagiyamaMissile