VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: WoW needs a FFA Server. [Locked]
Auenwing  3 stars
Title: straightface
Posts: 589
Registered: 2002-12-27 23:23:12
Elmador_MoK posted:

For the TLDR crowd: Not all FFA PvPers are dicks, WoW FFA PvP server would not hurt you and some of us want it.


The claims that all people in favor of FFA PvP are jerks and griefers is about as fair as the generalization that all PvEers are role-playing, lonely proto-nerds that need to kills some dragons on the internet for socialization.


Many of us on Darktide, and in other FFA PvP situations (shadowbane, AoC, while they lasted etc), are Antis that oppose RPKers. Its a more thrilling and authentic PvP experience when you choose to get along with your friends, and give battle to your enemies. Forced and incontrovertible faction loyalty can cause its own form of grief. Tell me true, have you NEVER wanted to roll the trade channel champs, or that guy that totally stole your titanium ore? I like FFA, and I play wow on a PvP server, but I won't kill you if you don't give me a reason. I'm not alone. The presence of douchebags in WoW is ubiquitous. A lot of people on a FFA server would kill you on sight, with a song in their hearts. If that doesn't life your luggage, don't get on the plane! I for one like hunting those little pricks. Frontier justice.


As to the problems of implementation, FFA PvP code already exists ala the gurubashi arena and ring of blood, etc.


All the older MMO historians are pointing to Mordred, and thats fair. But it should be remembered: At its height, did DAOC even reach 1 million subs? WoW is enormous and might have enough interest in it (how could I know for sure?). IF there is, a WoW FFAPvP server would be pretty cool imo. DAoC also offered the best world pvp that imo the genre has ever seen, so that splintered the interest (which was already well established with Mordred came out).


As to balance concerns, I can only laugh. Blizzard and ghostcrawler seem so oblivious to solutions to the problems that already exist I can't see adding one FFA server (that I would be fine with them ignoring, just laissez-fair style 'here it is, player beware) making trouble.



I could say balance concerns were thrown out the window the minute the arenas landed, but that just highlighted them. Next.


DAoC of course only reached over what ~300k subscribers at its zenith? (350k? Been too long). Not a matter of numbers, but the fact that FFA there was the snake that ate its own tail. The servers were going self-destruct in the end, because the griefers ran off anyone new to the server by not giving them a chance to level, denying themselves new fodder and getting bored with the already decayed ones. (Sorry for not describing that in more elegant terms, it's just not worth going into.)


Now, to be fair, in the end, I really have no problem if Blizzard wants to set up and maintain a couple of FFA servers. If they want to dedicate the money to set up, and separate code maintenance, that's theirs to decide. Just take a PvP server, don't have any safe zones, and allow x-faction grouping/communication. Simple. (This is why I'm a retired dev and can wave my hands magically over stupid statements like this.)


They've already tried the pre-paid arena server. So it shows if they want to make money from it, they will. Which ALSO means, if they thought it would make money, they probably would have already tried. (Maybe they don't have the bandwidth to make the changes.)


And you can argue out here about 1-way tickets over. I can argue that what they can do is charge $15 extra a month, per month, to maintain a copy of ONE existing character per account (static at time of copy) for anyone who wants to play there to defray ongoing maintenance costs as long as the servers exist, instead of one-time fees. Might have a chance of longer survival of the server that way, rather than shutting it down once if it falls (as it might) to below a low-pop server level.


Or they can decide to be inclusive and allow that playstyle as part of their overall portfolio. (Insert % of players that were raiders during Vanilla. Understanding of course, that Blizzard has spent time since then, still trying to motivate players into a larger percentage bracket.)


On the other hand, with the WoW community the way it is, maybe the FFA servers would thrive.


And then the everybody will point at the new kid on the block (FFA) as the culprit for imbalance.


Objectively, not objectionably yours,


-Half-formed thoughts


edits for typos

 

-----signature-----
There are those who play tank classes, and those that tank.
The weapon is only as good as the person wielding it.
Free advice is often worth what you pay for it: nothing.
Fedup23  2 stars
Posts: 358
Registered: 2006-7-14 06:15:32
jojo263 posted:

Fedup23 posted:

jojo263 posted:

Alpha_Swift posted:

_Warlucky_ posted:

I am pretty sure Cat will be the last expansion for WOW so maybe in another year the will latch onto this idea to keep interest up for the dozen or so people that would be interested.



lol, ya I heard Blizzard decided to stop making money.



Yes because not making another xpac for WoW means blizzard isn't working on anything else.



Yes, because I would definitely decide NOT to sell anymore widgets if I had 10 million people in line to buy one.


Yeah I think there is going to be a lot of broken hearts a year from now as far as what blizzard does with world of warcraft it's store and subscription plans for certain content.


I see you have a difference of opinion .. but seriously think about it.. we all know Blizz is in works to produce another MMO ...but given their track record of YEARS to put out new games.. why would they sacrifice millions of dollars in revenue to not keep 10 million + users satisfied at least a little bit. There will be another xpac.. it will probably be less than what most vocal users want (whats new) but it will happen.
jojo263  1 star
Posts: 164
Registered: 2003-6-18 14:03:47
Yeah if you scroll up you would see I wasn't the one who said there wont be another xpac.


I just don't understand why people think blizzard would go under without WoW.

 

-----signature-----
Get armed
portablehospital  1 star
Posts: 125
Registered: 2002-5-25 07:12:36
-Peo- posted:

Go pull the wings off of flies for your jerk fix, problem solved.

All FFA does is cater to jerks.



Hey look, a simpleton

 

-----signature-----
Forever waiting for a "pvp" game
Ugh_Lancelot  3 stars
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 766
Registered: 2002-6-17 14:37:05
jojo263 posted:

Yeah if you scroll up you would see I wasn't the one who said there wont be another xpac.

I just don't understand why people think blizzard would go under without WoW.

Wait, who said Blizzard would go under if they didn't do another xpack for wow?

[edit] On the other hand, didn't WoW alone make up 75% of Actiblizzard's total revenue last year or something?

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
regulator_cracka  4 stars
Title: They finally recognized greatness.
Posts: 3,726
Registered: 2009-1-6 15:07:53
Elmador_MoK posted:

For the TLDR crowd:


and did I mention

 

-----signature-----
Self Appointed Smart Ass - Level 80
If you think my opinion is idiotic, re-read yours.
Dont worry I will give my opinion anyways.
The PvP MMO is NOT a "niche" market, Mythic is just a "niche" company.
Okra
Posts: 16
Registered: 2002-8-21 10:36:21
Rill_of_WE posted:

Ugh the only time I EVER tried darktide

of Asheron's Call? heh, i too once tried to get started there on Darktide but kept getting ganked as soon as i attempted to log in. i had gotten the impression that it's the attitude of "its OUR server. .STAY OUT!" never tried again. just stayed in Leafcull, 4 yrs.
TinMan52  1 star
Posts: 108
Registered: 2006-9-13 08:04:35
-Peo- posted:

All FFA does is cater to jerks.



If you view FFA as anarchy.

FFA to me doesn't mean people can do whatever they want. You would still have rules and guards. You could even add level limits for PvP in certain zones or spawn more guards in certain zones like EVE does.

Just to reiterate, what I found in AoC FFA was a much more social atmosphere ... an actual reason to create a guild and quest with a group of friends. That was refreshing given the trend towards solo level play that the genre has seen in recent years.

We've gotten so far away from grouping in WoW, except for end game content and instanced PvP, and I think that's a major problem with the game. I enjoy the story in WoW, but leveling has been and continues to be pretty mindless and some FFA PvP could add a lot of fun to the game.

 

-----signature-----
"Sometimes new is fun and fun is the point. Will it still be fun once it's not new? I hope so, but I honestly don't know."
"Shared danger is a crap load of fun."
"our idea is compelling and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter."
Foojo  1 star
Posts: 147
Registered: 2008-8-18 16:16:47
Deja vu all over again. The manly men need a FFA server.

 

-----signature-----
...
Slors
Posts: 33
Registered: 2007-3-14 14:25:56
^^ I think just more experienced/older gamers who have actually been around more than just wow would like the option. hell for our 20mill subs we give them or w/e they're up to now i think having a few more options really shouldn't even need to be asked for.

 

-----signature-----
The Indecisive Syndicate
WTB TOR or 40K!
http://gimpchimp.etilader.com/display.php?user=Slor
"aw, c'mon. screw that internet crap, i mean; what is the internet? seriously..what is the internet?" -Pickles

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.