VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Druid Tank Issues [Locked]
Vault_News  3 stars
Title: 0110011010
Be Nice to Me I'm a Bot

Posts: 982
Registered: 2005-10-18 12:53:17
Bashiok posted:

Quote:

After the designers looked into this issue more, there appears to be a pretty complex series of bugs that may have led to where we are now. I'll do my best to explain.

Early on in Cataclysm, it was concluded that druid tanks took too much damage and we deployed a hotfix to buff their armor through Thick Hide. Originally, we had thought that 4.0.6 was just updating the Thick Hide tooltip as well as the armor display on the character sheet for the earlier hotfix, but we think now that the armor buff itself was actually correctly applied with 4.0.6, and the previous hotfix had never taken hold properly.

The reason we missed this is because there is no easy way to know what your armor actually is when you can?t trust the tooltip ? you have to have things beat on you and see how much damage you take. This test was tainted by a second bug however, where some druid characters were invisibly retaining the 12% damage reduction benefit of the obsolete Protector of the Pack talent. Even though we removed that talent, its effects were still benefitting some characters, and we didn't know who or how many. Again, there is no easy way to know if your druid was affected without a lot of testing. We knew about the Protector of the Pack bug but were hesitant to try and mess with it too much via hotfix since bear survivability was where we wanted it to be for those characters and we didn?t want to risk making anything worse. In any event, those characters appeared to be taking the correct amount of damage, so we thought the Thick Hide hotfix was successful. In reality, we think we were seeing the Protector of the Pack damage reduction and not the Thick Hide armor buff.

We believe the 4.0.6 patch finally removed the Protector of the Pack effects while finally getting the Thick Hide buff applied. Characters who had the Protector of the Pack benefit won?t see their survivability change much (they lost damage reduction while gaining armor), while characters who lacked that talent will see their survivability improve (they gained a lot of armor). The good news is that current bear survivability in 4.0.6 appears to be where we want it to be for everyone.

We?re still not 100% sure that the above explanation is what happened, but it seems consistent with our observations. Again, as of 4.0.6, bear armor should now be correct.



Posted from WoW Vault
Malachi256  1 star
Posts: 158
Registered: 2002-11-12 17:33:28
Kinda scary that there isn't some "developer layer" of information that they can just look at to see that a druid still has the 12% damage reduction (or whatever). The whole "we just have to have something beat on a druid and look at the numbers" sounds completely ghetto, like something an end-user would do.

 

-----signature-----
Explorer / Soloer+Small groups / Some PvP
MMOin' since UO beta, still waiting for UO 2.0 done right
Arcilite_I  4 stars
Title: VN's Most Wanted
Posts: 1,260
Registered: 2002-1-27 08:46:24
This is what pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars a month gets you, developers who don't know a god damn thing.

 

-----signature-----
PvPing since 1977
NukeMage  2 stars
Posts: 346
Registered: 2002-4-7 16:58:45
I usually tend to be more on the "fanboi" side of things, but the above statement is pretty ridiculous. How can a major developer NOT know if/what abilities are being applied? Are there not internal testing tools that would show what effects are coinciding at the same time? How are they testing changes and new abilities if they are unable to see what is currently affecting a character?


What "other" things are going on that they are completely unaware about and apparently incapable of figuring out?

 

-----signature-----
I need a new hobby . .
Ten level 85's (one of each class) in WoW
Back to try out the Feb patch in AC
Broken_Kayfabe  1 star
Posts: 248
Registered: 2002-2-16 01:05:01
NukeMage posted:

What "other" things are going on that they are completely unaware about and apparently incapable of figuring out?



That their lead designer, Ghostcrawler, is utterly incompetent comes immediately to mind.

 

-----signature-----
Thanks, but it's been fun
Five more minutes then I'm done!
I've been saying that to myself since
...yesterday.
- from "Has anybody seen my corpse". Man Everquest rocked back in the day...
TinMan52  1 star
Posts: 108
Registered: 2006-9-13 08:04:35
NukeMage posted:

I usually tend to be more on the "fanboi" side of things, but the above statement is pretty ridiculous. How can a major developer NOT know if/what abilities are being applied? Are there not internal testing tools that would show what effects are coinciding at the same time? How are they testing changes and new abilities if they are unable to see what is currently affecting a character?

What "other" things are going on that they are completely unaware about and apparently incapable of figuring out?



You would think that they could do some automation testing using scripts to see if certain skills, spells and/or talents are working correctly in terms of damage and damage mitigation.

I like that the development cycle has been shortened, but all the hot fixes recently definitely give me concern. One the one hand, it's good that Blizzard is being responsive to production related issues. On the other hand, why does a software company have to patch so many live problems?

 

-----signature-----
"Sometimes new is fun and fun is the point. Will it still be fun once it's not new? I hope so, but I honestly don't know."
"Shared danger is a crap load of fun."
"our idea is compelling and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter."
-Peo-  2 stars
Title: Caveat Lector
Posts: 408
Registered: 2005-2-2 08:38:42
Broken_Kayfabe posted:

NukeMage posted:

What "other" things are going on that they are completely unaware about and apparently incapable of figuring out?



That their lead designer, Ghostcrawler, is utterly incompetent comes immediately to mind.



Its funny, I said this a year ago and got heavily mocked. Like I said a year ago, in 3 years GC will be a punchline not a developer. And it is getting closer and closer to a reality.

 

-----signature-----
SWTOR, Maybe in a year.
Back to WoW for now.
With a lil f2p CoH.
Renegade.  1 star
Title: Hate the player, not the game
Posts: 71
Registered: 2008-5-7 11:52:34
Can we have our threat back now? I have a feeling that is "bugged" atm as well.

 

-----signature-----
Roses are #FF0000 , Violets are #0000FF
All my base belongs to you
Kriegprojekt  3 stars
Posts: 590
Registered: 2010-4-12 13:06:28
Arcilite_I posted:

This is what pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars a month gets you, developers who don't know a god damn thing.



They are really suffering under the B Team right now.

 

-----signature-----
http://www.immortal-guild.com/
Deepstrike Server
Milkman - Guardian Bard
slythetove  1 star
Title: Julie's Pool Boy
Posts: 146
Registered: 2001-11-7 11:12:56
NukeMage posted:

What "other" things are going on that they are completely unaware about and apparently incapable of figuring out?



Based on what Cataclysm was like at release, I'd say a LOT.

--Sly

 

-----signature-----
"a slap in the face" since 1975
85 Priest - 85 Hunter - 85 Mage - 83 Druid
81 Warlock - 80 Paladin - 80 DK
70 Rogue - 70 Warrior

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.