VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Mists of Pandaria Live Dev Q&A - 10.27, 5 pm PDT [Locked]
Arunne  1 star
Title: The Anonymous
Posts: 177
Registered: 2003-11-3 14:11:47
Ghostcrawler posted:

We aren't happy at all with Prime glyphs because they are no-brainers (but often mathy to figure that out). We want to expand the Major glyphs because that is where the real decisions lie. Not sure of the future of Primes quite yet. They *might* go away. (Don't freak, scribes!)



I love his complicated sounding answer to, well we ditched path of the titans and added a useless level of glyphs to compensate but they are stupid so we are going to get rid of them "maybe". You would think he would love prime glyphs being no-brainers. That seems to stick right to his vision.

 

-----signature-----
"Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be"
"I may not agree with what you say, but I respect your right to be punished for it."
Arcilite_I  4 stars
Title: VN's Most Wanted
Posts: 1,260
Registered: 2002-1-27 08:46:24
Quote:

Comment From Eldacar
At Blizzcon Tom Chilton mentioned possible incentives for raiding enemy towns to encourage world PVP in mists, can Greg or Cory elaborate on this at all?


Mumper:
In regards to extra rewards for world pvp, we are contemplating the idea of increasing players conquest point caps by an extra 10-15%.



This is their solution to encouraging world PvP? Really?

Also, the word "balance" is in there 927 times. IT DOES NOT EXIST YOU F'IN RETARDS.

 

-----signature-----
PvPing since 1977

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.