I installed it on my laptop using the win7->win8 upgrade option. It did not download many thing, but took forever and a day to install.. seriously, probably over 1 hour in total.. maybe 1.5 hrs. Rebooted about 5 times.
All this installation didn't leave me much time to play with it last night, but I'll use it as primary laptop OS for a while and write more once I have a good grasp. Superficial impressions here, deep thoughts later.
Anyway, once done I finally got in and was greeted with the Metro start menu. I got out of it, and lo and behold, the UI behind it is basically Win7 with sharper edges. Feels very weird and disjointed - the 2 interfaces have almost nothing in common. It is like the Metro is a patch they dragged over and used in only 1 instance in the whole OS.
You get thrown from a 2D, solid color, big block, simple Metro UI to a desktop with "fancy", shimmery, small-sized taskbar? Whaaat?
Start menu app icons are in metro style, but desktop icons, Taskbar icons are not, windows and windows drop-down menus are not....
They need to either re-vamp ALL windows and UI elements across the whole OS to have the solid color background and no borders like the blocks in the Metro UI, or change Metro to match the rest of the windows.
The inconsistency gave me a very sloppy, unprofessional feeling - kind of like early android UI - different elements have different styles. The "regular" windows UI was changed, but so little as to be negligible. It's like 2 teams worked on it and were not talking to each other but from afar, through fog, with hand gestures. Not good.
After I got to the desktop, I tried using the search tool to find Windows Update an some other programs.. well that part was sucky too - it searches everywhere but displays results in buckets. The default bucket is Apps, so of course Win Update was not there. I had to select the settings (i think) bucket to see it. I thought they said Metro UI will result in LESS clicks than before, what happened to that? Why does it not display them all on once screen?
It can certainly fit all results... if they have to be separated separate them by some line saying something like:
Apps-----------
<list of results>
Settings-------
<list of results>
, etc.
Don't make me click unnecessarily.
I still need to install a bunch of apps and see how easy it will be to find and launch them using the Metro start menu, but from what I saw I will need to do a lot more scrolling than in Win 7.
Starting Windows Explorer form the Metro ribbon icon was much slower than in Win 7. a couple of time it did not even start - I click on it, Metro UI goes away, and all I get is desktop - no Win Explorer. Is it such a heavy program to start? Blah.
When it started, another unpleasant surprise - Windows Explorer still defaults to the silly Libraries - there should be some way to let me choose where I want my Win Explorer to start without fiddling with registry and whatnot. Something like a first time use question, or an easily reachable option in the drop down menu or why not a right-click menu option "from now on start here when launched"?
Come on MS - get things right! People have been bitching about this since day 1 of Vista, websites have tutorials how to circumvent the default setting. A hint for you - when people want something to a point where it gets out of forum discussions and websites write tutorials about it - turn it into an official feature/option for the next version of your OS.
There are some good things too. For example, I do like the Windows button launching the metro ribbon no matter where you are.
I do like the copy/move windows now - the graphs, pause option and all copy windows being combined is long overdue. Will need to test that a bit more before I can say it works fine though.
A question for you guys: Can we make the metro ribbon taller so it fits more blocks on one screen?
-----signature-----
Men do not differ much about what things they will call evils; they differ enormously about what evils they will call excusable. ~ G. K. Chesterton