Fist_de_Yuma posted:
Yes, an undeclared war is a problem but only the really stupid would think we are not at war. It is hard to declare war on a group of people who don't follow any rule of law or war. Liberals would have us shackled to the standards of a declared war when the enemy can do anything they want. It makes for a hard legal battle but it takes very little common sense to see that holding them for as long as possible is the only solution.
Yes, allowing your government to be at war against an enemy who could effectively be anybody, against a broad idea which will never cease to exist in our world seems like a good idea. Undeclared war at that, with incredibly unclear boundaries.
I would have us shackled to the rules that created our country in the first place, but it seems some of you would rather our congress just threw it on the floor and walked right over it, after pissing all over it that is in the name of
safety.
10 years down, here's to another 100, with ever further freedom encroaching regulations and broader definitions of what constitutes a 'terrorist'!
It'll be fun once that pesky due process and, in particular, habeus corpus, has been completely removed for everyone in order to keep us all
safe from the very scary and everywhere
terrorism. Loving all this fear mongering and the legislation that goes with it.
/sarcasm
fkn fisted sheep.
-----signature-----
"When the government scares people into thinking it must take their liberties away,
and the people let the Government do it.
They are sheep."
- Judge Andrew Napolitano
http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php