VaultNetwork.net Vault Network Boards
Author Topic: I don't understand why Ron Paul is being congratulated [Locked]
MayorShade  2 stars
Title: Not Special Forces
Posts: 258
Registered: 2004-3-1 10:40:52
Moe_Nox posted:

Ron Paul will not run as an independent, he will toe the party line and support Romney when its time.



Doubt it. He really doesn't have much if anything to gain from doing so. And he simply just doesn't have much if anything to lose from running as an independent. No matter where his political path leads him, that path will not likely last much longer. I am not convinced that he gives two flying fcks if the republican nominee wins the presidential election (assuming that he is not the nominee). Does anyone disagree with what I've said? If so, explain why.

 

-----signature-----
"drive a SUV and have a Apple straped to your azz" - Blue_Arrow
"ou guys know that I love homosexuals." - GrilledCheez
Taliesihne  4 stars
Title: Wind on the Deep Waters
Posts: 1,117
Registered: 2004-2-19 04:47:59
His son is a junior Republican Senator Mayor.

It's no longer just his own political future he's playing with.

*Edit - Don't be naive in believing that the RNC won't use Rand to get to Ron either. It's the presidency at stake*

 

-----signature-----
Jesus saves, Allah protects, and Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. -Roland Deschain, of Gilead
theredkay1  3 stars
Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
Sin_of_Onin posted:

The problems with a two party system mostly deal with the legislature. With only two parties the people are less likely to be able to really establish what they want when choosing between two things.


For example imagine choosing what pie you want to eat. Do you think your taste in pie would be better established when choosing between two pies or 10?


Once this is done the legislature itself has to establish things like committee leadership based on something more than which party happens to be the majority. A lot more emphasis is placed on listening to multiple groups and the room for nuances in opinion is promoted.



Maybe it will make people feel better....


But right now I can choose from 10 pies. There is no restriction on pies with orange peels from jumping up on the counter for me to choose from, there is no restriction on me going in search of a pie with orange peels and voting for it.


An orange peel pie was selected by a small group of people in Texas. So obviously there is no real impediment to people everywhere choosing orange peel pie. The problem isnt that apple and cherry are secretely pushing levers to keep orange peel pie from being chosen, the problem is that people tend to pick cherry and apple. Allowing a third pie stand will cause most people to vote for an apple or cherry...they will keep rejecting the orange peel pie that they have been rejecting for years.


WIthout a change in the voting process or the legislature process, the new 3 party congress will look exactly like the two party congress.


The voting process in Euro countries with strong multi-party systems is completely different than the US voting system right?
Sin_of_Onin  4 stars
Posts: 1,307
Registered: 2005-6-29 08:21:12
theredkay1 posted:

Sin_of_Onin posted:

The problems with a two party system mostly deal with the legislature. With only two parties the people are less likely to be able to really establish what they want when choosing between two things.


For example imagine choosing what pie you want to eat. Do you think your taste in pie would be better established when choosing between two pies or 10?


Once this is done the legislature itself has to establish things like committee leadership based on something more than which party happens to be the majority. A lot more emphasis is placed on listening to multiple groups and the room for nuances in opinion is promoted.



Maybe it will make people feel better....


But right now I can choose from 10 pies. There is no restriction on pies with orange peels from jumping up on the counter for me to choose from, there is no restriction on me going in search of a pie with orange peels and voting for it.


An orange peel pie was selected by a small group of people in Texas. So obviously there is no real impediment to people everywhere choosing orange peel pie. The problem isnt that apple and cherry are secretely pushing levers to keep orange peel pie from being chosen, the problem is that people tend to pick cherry and apple. Allowing a third pie stand will cause most people to vote for an apple or cherry...they will keep rejecting the orange peel pie that they have been rejecting for years.


WIthout a change in the voting process or the legislature process, the new 3 party congress will look exactly like the two party congress.


The voting process in Euro countries with strong multi-party systems is completely different than the US voting system right?



The proof is in the puddin.


I am suggesting a change btw. I thought that was clear.

 

-----signature-----
"Okay... I'm with you fellas" --Delmar
F is for Fake-believe
"We apologise for the inconvenience" --God
"What Jesus fails to appreciate is that it's the meek who are the problem"--Reg
Run, Forrest! Run!
Voodoo-Dahl  2 stars
Posts: 469
Registered: 2002-5-11 05:11:16
Everybody gets a medal at the Special Olympics the Republican primary has become.

Seriously, if Republitwats are to be believed they think another four years of Obama will be the end of the country. And these fools, crazies, and common grifters are the best they have to offer?

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.