GrilledCheez posted:
You are clearly biased against them...
I think it's hilarious that you make judgments about the vast majority of evangelicals based on your experience with mega churches...
You are clearly biased against them...
I think it's hilarious that you make judgments about the vast majority of evangelicals based on your experience with mega churches...
I'm not going to write a 200 page book on this. I use the mega-church example as the most obvious example, but in fact much of my experience is with ministers/pastors (and their families), deacons, members, former members of smaller community congregations.
I have a couple in my immediate family who are quite decent. One is an in-law whom I consider a role model, and with whom I have some great ethical/political chats.
On the whole, across hundreds of examples I could spend a week citing... what I've said is simply the case. If you don't see it for lack of personal clarity or a broad enough perspective, that's not my problem.
Most religious have their unique characteristics and quirks, springing from their core belief set. I'd guess most members of most religions don't adhere to their creeds earnestly. But I don't have to guess about most fundy religions... I know. This pattern is simply what springs from most Fundy religiosity, for the majority of their members.
-----signature-----
In the immortal words of Socrates - "I drank what?"
"God you guys suck at the internet - how can you fail to locate porn?!" - Eternal_Midnight
"Knowing means nothing." - Fat-badger
"God you guys suck at the internet - how can you fail to locate porn?!" - Eternal_Midnight
"Knowing means nothing." - Fat-badger


