Coriolus posted:
I missed you, glad you could show up in my thread, like clockwork, like a doggie to cheese doodles

After getting owned so completely and thoroughly that
you locked your last thread to hide it... I would think you'd give some of what I say at least a
little research.
But, since it's based in math, physics and logic you dutifully avoid it like the plague.
ineenia posted:
(didn't watch the vid)
I'm not in any way saying there were giants ,I've seen no evidence that convinces me there were but if you acknowledge Gigantopithecus. existed ,you have acknowledged the bipedal form can support that size.It is scientifically possible that Gigantopithecus. and humans could have interbred or that we carry the genes that would make that size possible.I don't think the "it is not scientifically possible" argument holds much weight at all.On the other hand the people who believe in "giants" fall short when it comes to any real evidence.
So, you didn't watch the vid and have no idea what is being discussed yet firmly believe that the "not scientifically possible" argument doesn't hold up?
Wait... whut?
You should probably watch the video - that way you know at least what's being discussed before you put your foot in your mouth.
A humanoid with a 5 foot shoe size is TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE. It's not scientifically possible, not mathematically possible, and not physically possible. You're talking about a humanoid 36 feet tall weighing more than 43,000 pounds - heavier than an African Bull Elephant and three times heavier than a Tyrannosaurus Rex.
He would take one step and every bone in his body would shatter like glass - and nothing that evolution could do would prevent that.
-----signature-----
* First rule of a gun fight: Have a gun.
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke