| Author |
Topic:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
[Locked] |
Bowlartz
Title: Offical VN Tin Foil Hat Supplier
Posts: 221
Registered: 2006-1-4 19:59:15
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
Scarne posted:
Aerlinthian posted:
If it decides to approve homosexual relationships then it must also approve polygamy and polyandry.
It does not have to. 
Why doesn't it? Why would the rights of two people be greater than three? And for all intents and purposes the relationship could be considered between two people at any one time.
I see no legal basis for the idea that if same sex marriage is approved that polygamy can not be.
It doesn't change my view as to how the ruling will go, just curious as to what the difference between consenting adults is since that would be the standard.
-----signature-----
Fellow Conservatives, put your money
where your forum mouth is...
http://www.kiva.org/
Lend a little to entrepreneurs around the world so
that they can show the world how it works...
|
paulg_68
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
theredkay1 posted:
paulg_68 posted:
Libtards love to complain that the court is conservative. If SCOTUS votes 7-2 for gay marriage that will prove libtards wrong yet again.
Every week paul has a new definition for the word 'conservative'. 
What's my definition this week?
Do tell.
-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1
|
theredkay1
Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
Aerlinthian posted:
If it decides to approve homosexual relationships then it must also approve polygamy and polyandry.
Why?
Im pretty sure that basic math still holds in your world. 2 does not equal 3.
Why doesnt allowing people with different color hair to marry require the approval of polygamy and polyandry?
|
Yukishiro1
Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
|
But it isn't just a contract and people will never treat it just like a contract. That line is just more pie in the sky nonsense from people out of touch with reality.
Contract law is set up for a situation where there are two disinterested parties of roughly equally bargaining power both looking to guard their own interests. Marriage is about as far as you can possibly get from that.
|
Ashmaele
Title: Pastor of Muppets
Posts: 1,809
Registered: 2002-1-15 08:30:50
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
paulg_68 posted:
Libtards love to complain that the court is conservative. If SCOTUS votes 7-2 for gay marriage that will prove libtards wrong yet again.
Which will make it all the more sweet when they crush Obamacare.
So the court being conservative or not hinges on its ruling in one case?
Solid thinking there brah.
-----signature-----
I had a dream. It was an incredible dream. When I awoke, I had a huge mess to clean up.
|
Bowlartz
Title: Offical VN Tin Foil Hat Supplier
Posts: 221
Registered: 2006-1-4 19:59:15
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
"Why?
Im pretty sure that basic math still holds in your world. 2 does not equal 3."
So if three people are in a consenting, loving relationship their rights don't apply as if they were only two? Why would they be denied their right to privacy, happiness etc?
No, I see no legal basis to restrict marriage in any form short of age (due to established rule of contract) if same sex marriage is approved.
Multiple people can enter into a contract.
-----signature-----
Fellow Conservatives, put your money
where your forum mouth is...
http://www.kiva.org/
Lend a little to entrepreneurs around the world so
that they can show the world how it works...
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
theredkay1 posted:
Why doesnt allowing people with different color hair to marry require the approval of polygamy and polyandry?
Why do you hate freedom?
Oh wait, I know. You're a member of the Taliban. 
|
theredkay1
Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
Bowlartz posted:
"Why?
Im pretty sure that basic math still holds in your world. 2 does not equal 3."
So if three people are in a consenting, loving relationship their rights don't apply as if they were only two? Why would they be denied their right to privacy, happiness etc?
No, I see no legal basis to restrict marriage in any form short of age (due to established rule of contract) if same sex marriage is approved.
Multiple people can enter into a contract.
I dont disagree. The argument for polygamy does not hinge on gay marriage.
|
dae_trist
Posts: 1,049
Registered: 2003-6-5 13:32:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
Bowlartz posted:
Why doesn't it? Why would the rights of two people be greater than three? And for all intents and purposes the relationship could be considered between two people at any one time.
I see no legal basis for the idea that if same sex marriage is approved that polygamy can not be.
It doesn't change my view as to how the ruling will go, just curious as to what the difference between consenting adults is since that would be the standard.
Simply because "hetero marriage" sets the precedent. If gay marriage results in polygamous marriage, it follows that "hetero marriage" between one woman and one man leads logically to polygamy.
-----signature-----
"templars heal for like 300-400 a heal"
"wardens do waht 40 dps at most? friars do 600 dps"
"well maybe the aoe taunt that bains had..."
"Eck theurg pets are unstunnable..." -- bryldan
|
theredkay1
Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Pre-9th Circuit Appeals Court Gay Marriage Ruling Thread
|
paulg_68 posted:
theredkay1 posted:
paulg_68 posted:
Libtards love to complain that the court is conservative. If SCOTUS votes 7-2 for gay marriage that will prove libtards wrong yet again.
Every week paul has a new definition for the word 'conservative'.
What's my definition this week?
Do tell.
If you are against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation...you are apparently not in the 'conservative' boat.
Were you not following your post?
|
