VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: A Constitutional Convention [Locked]
Brother_Tempus  3 stars
Title: Patriot
Posts: 985
Registered: 2001-1-9 08:07:00
one question, what will be the status of those states who do not ratify the new Constituon, especially if there are enough of them to make the "new state" non-contiguous

 

-----signature-----
You win ACF, dude - Osmenthe
BT is usually right - Onslaught
i think we need more BT on page 1 - FighterUSAF
Yep, BT is right - Aerlinthian
Got guns & ammo? Food? Precious metals?
Kjarhall  3 stars
Title: The Pungent One
Posts: 915
Registered: 2002-3-1 15:47:21
imaloon1 posted:

I do not believe that. I believe that's what you're shown on a nightly basis, but the overwhelming majority of people in this country are just what you would expect out of a populace who just isn't given a fair chance anymore.



The majority of the people in this country have no clue about most things, this easily being one of them.

 

-----signature-----
You're a crazy moron*
*http://vnboards.ign.com/outpost/b22180/115147923/r115151508/
hah! true story tho i'm a woman an i even love boobs..how can you not??- HallowEve
Scarne  4 stars
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts: 1,087
Registered: 2001-7-23 15:24:34
Brother_Tempus posted:

one question, what will be the status of those states who do not ratify the new Constituon, especially if there are enough of them to make the "new state" non-contiguous


If enough states ratify, then it applies to everyone, not just the states that ratify.

 

-----signature-----
E Pluribus Unum
Ptilk  4 stars
Title: Creepy old pirate
Posts: 2,359
Registered: 2002-2-13 14:52:58
What exactly would be the purpose of a constitutional convention (AKA a revolt and overthrow of the country) other than getting all the "states rights" nuts in one place so we could arrest them all and send them to Gitmo?
Tych2  4 stars
Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
imaloon1 posted:

It's not about going through the channels though it's about having 250 million people showing up in DC asking for a do over.

We couldn't have 250 million in DC! That's too many people. We'd flip the continent over!!!

 

-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks
Taliesihne  4 stars
Title: Wind on the Deep Waters
Posts: 1,117
Registered: 2004-2-19 04:47:59
I'm not opposed to the idea. The devil is in the details however.

I also think it's generally not a good time for it.

 

-----signature-----
Jesus saves, Allah protects, and Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. -Roland Deschain, of Gilead
Kjarhall  3 stars
Title: The Pungent One
Posts: 915
Registered: 2002-3-1 15:47:21
Brother_Tempus posted:

one question, what will be the status of those states who do not ratify the new Constituon, especially if there are enough of them to make the "new state" non-contiguous



They'd all band together to build a giant bunker, so they'd have somewhere to roll around in their piles of gold and canned goods.

 

-----signature-----
You're a crazy moron*
*http://vnboards.ign.com/outpost/b22180/115147923/r115151508/
hah! true story tho i'm a woman an i even love boobs..how can you not??- HallowEve
Koneg  3 stars
Title: Evil Genius
Posts: 894
Registered: 2001-12-4 15:31:28
Ptilk posted:

What exactly would be the purpose of a constitutional convention (AKA a revolt and overthrow of the country) other than getting all the "states rights" nuts in one place so we could arrest them all and send them to Gitmo?

You really don't understand what the Constitution is, do you?


The Constitution defines the limits of the Federal Government. That's it. That's all it does. "This is what you can do in a nutshell" for the Federal Government.


Literally everything else is by definition and specific intent a "State Right", not a Federal one.


If you are opposed to such a fundamental precept of our Republic the only conclusion one can logically draw from that is that you are in favor of total Federal authority. In other words, you want a dictatorship, not a Republic?

 

-----signature-----
* First rule of a gun fight: Have a gun.
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke
Brother_Tempus  3 stars
Title: Patriot
Posts: 985
Registered: 2001-1-9 08:07:00
Scarne posted:

Brother_Tempus posted:

one question, what will be the status of those states who do not ratify the new Constituon, especially if there are enough of them to make the "new state" non-contiguous


If enough states ratify, then it applies to everyone, not just the states that ratify.



and if there is not enough or enough to say we don't care about majority ratification? Without a credible external threat as the alternative to sink or swim with the majority, there is no way to coerce states that do not want to play ball

 

-----signature-----
You win ACF, dude - Osmenthe
BT is usually right - Onslaught
i think we need more BT on page 1 - FighterUSAF
Yep, BT is right - Aerlinthian
Got guns & ammo? Food? Precious metals?
Tych2  4 stars
Title: Obama Appointed Outpost Czar
Posts: 2,511
Registered: 2005-3-1 06:56:47
Kjarhall posted:

Brother_Tempus posted:

one question, what will be the status of those states who do not ratify the new Constituon, especially if there are enough of them to make the "new state" non-contiguous



They'd all band together to build a giant bunker, so they'd have somewhere to roll around in their piles of gold and canned goods.

 

-----signature-----
We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
Drill Anwar!
Kapie
Drevid in Tanks

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.