Yukishiro1 posted:
The original game was built with the day-one extra-cost DLC in mind
The original game was built with the day-one extra-cost DLC in mind
Uhm. Duh?
Yukishiro1 posted:
It's just the logical next step in "DLC." I've been saying for years DLC will just result in game companies making shorter games and charging you full price then gouging you for the rest of the game they would have made anyhow. This is a prime example of that.
It's just the logical next step in "DLC." I've been saying for years DLC will just result in game companies making shorter games and charging you full price then gouging you for the rest of the game they would have made anyhow. This is a prime example of that.
I'm not saying I disagree with you. I'm saying you're totally over-reacting.
If you don't want to be gouged... don't be?
Back to my Civ5 example. Civ came with something like 7 "DLCs". The original game was $60 and each DLC was ~$5 to ~$10.
When I bought it the game and all DLCs combined cost me $13.
The market is a self-correcting entity. If game makers can sell something for $60 and sell a bunch of add-ons for $7 they will. You and others like you have the ability to correct that behavior by just not buying it. Literally.
-----signature-----
* First rule of a gun fight: Have a gun.
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke
|
"Any sufficiently advanced idiocy is
indistinguishable from trolling." -- Arthur C Clarke


