vn_nnanji posted:
Szerek posted:
FYI, scrubbing jock straps and filling cups makes not a Div-1 expert on locker room behavior. Or were you a helmet painter?
Actually I was on the service squad at USC. The 1988-89 team. Seau, Peete, Carrier. We sent 15 guys to the NFL. Where did you play?
You're the one with the reading disorder. Hard hits is not the same as playing to injure. But a meltdown is a meltdown. Having fun?
I always have fun on here. You should do more reading on the whole "scandal" though. They where paid for big hits. They were paid MORE for knockouts and injuries. They weren't only paid for injuries. It should also be noted, this money was paid out of a pool of PLAYER money.
They do the same thing for big plays, picks, forced fumbles. The Redskins did the same thing in 2008 and prior with the same coach, yet there is no punishment for them. This is not new. It has been around for decades.
Football is a violent sport and fans go hysterical over the huge hits. It is a part of football DNA. Any football fan who is upset about players paying each other for big hits is a hypocrite. No where in any article I've read was it ever mentioned that they were issuing illegal hits with the sole purpose of injuring someone for 1,000 bucks. This was all to do with anything resulting from a legal hit.
Like I said earlier, players get fined for and maybe eventually suspended for dishing out seriously dangerous hits, but the NFL goes all eye-for-an-eye for exchanging a few bucks among players over LEGAL hits.
Maybe Ndamukong Suh should have been permanently banned from football last season? Nah, can't get rid of the leagues "dirtiest player", you have to go after dudes dishing out legal hits!
-----signature-----
"The reason they call it the American Dream is because you have to be asleep to believe it."
"The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions."
- George Carlin