VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: What will the SCOTUS do with Obamacare [Locked]
paulg_68  4 stars
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
(empty archived post)

 

-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1
Sea_of_inK  2 stars
Posts: 488
Registered: 2004-10-18 12:57:37
I hope it gets ruled unconstitutional and we get the public option we needed.

That probably won't happen though.

 

-----signature-----
paulg_68  4 stars
Posts: 2,469
Registered: 2009-7-27 18:45:54
The public option would have been a no-brainer if Democrats would just agree to cap government contributions. Theoretically it's supposed to act like a private insurance company therefore it shouldn't need a constant influx of government money.

Fine by me. Have $10 billion of startup money and never come back for more. When your little experiment fails don't whine for more money. You're not getting it.

 

-----signature-----
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
"Everyone has a chance to become rich." - Groucho48
"Most of the human wealth on earth exists between the ears of live human beings." - theredkay1
Groucho48  3 stars
Posts: 821
Registered: 2003-10-22 03:00:14
paulg_68 posted:

The public option would have been a no-brainer if Democrats would just agree to cap government contributions. Theoretically it's supposed to act like a private insurance company therefore it shouldn't need a constant influx of government money.

Fine by me. Have $10 billion of startup money and never come back for more. When your little experiment fails don't whine for more money. You're not getting it.





They did. They government was going to provide startup money and that was it. The option would be self-sufficient.

 

-----signature-----
“Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it.” – Richard Feynman
Yukishiro1  4 stars
Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
I still have some faith in the supreme court. So I am predicting 6-3 or 7-2 upholding it.


If they rule against it it will really just show we have a third political branch whenever the decision actually matters. People will stop looking at Bush v. Gore as an outlier and realize we are back to the days of an overtly political court, like we had in the 1920s-40s.
Phlegm573  3 stars
Posts: 528
Registered: 2002-6-12 17:43:34
8 of the 9 votes are foregone conclusions. It all depends on whether Anthony Kennedy's coin comes up heads, or tails.

 

-----signature-----
"I try to make men-only kinship?" - bstulic
"It takes balls to execute an innocent man." - actual Republican voter
http://tinyurl.com/6p8a7rp - summary of Israel vs. Palestine
Yukishiro1  4 stars
Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
I don't think that's true. Thomas is the only clear vote against based on past decision. Alito and Roberts haven't had a major commerce clause case on the supreme court, so it's hard to say. Scalia should vote for obamacare unless he decides to be a total hypocrite.


The 4 liberals will vote for it because it agrees with their basic jurisprudence, as should Kennedy based on his past decisions. That's five votes, and they should get Scalia and probably Roberts as well at the very least if those two don't decide to sell out to political pressure.
Bjorvald  2 stars
Posts: 334
Registered: 2002-4-5 20:51:00
Phlegm573 posted:

8 of the 9 votes are foregone conclusions. It all depends on whether Anthony Kennedy's coin comes up heads, or tails.



How can any vote be a forgone conclusion?

 

-----signature-----
Bjorvald 9lx healer
Blinknone, various toons on classic
GANKED AGAIN
Ashmaele  4 stars
Title: Pastor of Muppets
Posts: 1,809
Registered: 2002-1-15 08:30:50
It actually may wind up a tie because obviously Clarence Thomas will be recusing himself from this case due to clear conflict of interest (ie his wife has been actively campaigning against the law since like forever).

 

-----signature-----
I had a dream. It was an incredible dream. When I awoke, I had a huge mess to clean up.
IMHO  4 stars
Title: Official Outpost Greeter
Posts: 2,287
Registered: 2001-11-1 03:55:02
Ashmaele posted:

It actually may wind up a tie because obviously Clarence Thomas will be recusing himself from this case due to clear conflict of interest (ie his wife has been actively campaigning against the law since like forever).



 

-----signature-----
You're Right ~ Koneg
He's [Manegarm] like the Fred Phelps of atheism. ~Bubbledude
many of you are in the Republican boat, aka the ship of fools. ~Modeeb
We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different. ~Kurt Vonnegut

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.